[RFC PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Move TE setup to prepare_for_kickoff()
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Wed Feb 8 22:18:11 UTC 2023
On 08/02/2023 23:37, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> Currently, DPU will enable TE during prepare_commit(). However, this
> will cause issues when trying to read/write to register in
> get_autorefresh_config(), because the core clock rates aren't set at
> that time.
>
> This used to work because phys_enc->hw_pp is only initialized in mode
> set [1], so the first prepare_commit() will return before any register
> read/write as hw_pp would be NULL.
>
> However, when we try to implement support for INTF TE, we will run into
> the clock issue described above as hw_intf will *not* be NULL on the
> first prepare_commit(). This is because the initialization of
> dpu_enc->hw_intf has been moved to dpu_encoder_setup() [2].
>
> To avoid this issue, let's enable TE during prepare_for_kickoff()
> instead as the core clock rates are guaranteed to be set then.
>
> Depends on: "Implement tearcheck support on INTF block" [3]
>
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/blob/msm-next/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c#L1109
> [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/blob/msm-next/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c#L2339
> [3] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112332/
>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan at quicinc.com>
> ---
> .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c | 78 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> index 279a0b7015ce..746250bce3d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> @@ -587,39 +587,6 @@ static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_destroy(struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
> kfree(cmd_enc);
> }
>
> -static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_prepare_for_kickoff(
> - struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
> -{
> - struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd *cmd_enc =
> - to_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd(phys_enc);
> - int ret;
> -
> - if (!phys_enc->hw_pp) {
> - DPU_ERROR("invalid encoder\n");
> - return;
> - }
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("id:%u pp:%d pending_cnt:%d\n", DRMID(phys_enc->parent),
> - phys_enc->hw_pp->idx - PINGPONG_0,
> - atomic_read(&phys_enc->pending_kickoff_cnt));
> -
> - /*
> - * Mark kickoff request as outstanding. If there are more than one,
> - * outstanding, then we have to wait for the previous one to complete
> - */
> - ret = _dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_idle(phys_enc);
> - if (ret) {
> - /* force pending_kickoff_cnt 0 to discard failed kickoff */
> - atomic_set(&phys_enc->pending_kickoff_cnt, 0);
> - DRM_ERROR("failed wait_for_idle: id:%u ret:%d pp:%d\n",
> - DRMID(phys_enc->parent), ret,
> - phys_enc->hw_pp->idx - PINGPONG_0);
> - }
> -
> - DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "pp:%d pending_cnt %d\n",
> - phys_enc->hw_pp->idx - PINGPONG_0,
> - atomic_read(&phys_enc->pending_kickoff_cnt));
> -}
> -
> static bool dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_is_ongoing_pptx(
> struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
> {
> @@ -645,8 +612,7 @@ static bool dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_is_ongoing_pptx(
> return false;
> }
>
> -static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_prepare_commit(
> - struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
> +static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_enable_te(struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
> {
> struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd *cmd_enc =
> to_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd(phys_enc);
> @@ -704,6 +670,48 @@ static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_prepare_commit(
> "disabled autorefresh\n");
> }
>
> +static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_prepare_for_kickoff(
> + struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
Could you please move the function back to the place, so that we can see
the actual difference?
> +{
> + struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd *cmd_enc =
> + to_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd(phys_enc);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!phys_enc->hw_pp) {
> + DPU_ERROR("invalid encoder\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("id:%u pp:%d pending_cnt:%d\n", DRMID(phys_enc->parent),
> + phys_enc->hw_pp->idx - PINGPONG_0,
> + atomic_read(&phys_enc->pending_kickoff_cnt));
> +
> + /*
> + * Mark kickoff request as outstanding. If there are more than one,
> + * outstanding, then we have to wait for the previous one to complete
> + */
> + ret = _dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_idle(phys_enc);
> + if (ret) {
> + /* force pending_kickoff_cnt 0 to discard failed kickoff */
> + atomic_set(&phys_enc->pending_kickoff_cnt, 0);
> + DRM_ERROR("failed wait_for_idle: id:%u ret:%d pp:%d\n",
> + DRMID(phys_enc->parent), ret,
> + phys_enc->hw_pp->idx - PINGPONG_0);
> + }
> +
> + dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_enable_te(phys_enc);
> +
> + DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "pp:%d pending_cnt %d\n",
> + phys_enc->hw_pp->idx - PINGPONG_0,
> + atomic_read(&phys_enc->pending_kickoff_cnt));
> +}
> +
> +static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_prepare_commit(
> + struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
> +{
> +}
There is no need to have the empty callback, you can skip it completely.
Actually, if it is not needed anymore for the cmd encoders, you can drop
the .prepare_commit from struct dpu_encoder_phys_ops. And then, by
extension, dpu_encoder_prepare_commit(), dpu_kms_prepare_commit(). This
sounds like a nice second patch for this rfc.
> +
> static int _dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_wait_for_ctl_start(
> struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
> {
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list