[PATCH v10 00/11] Add generic memory shrinker to VirtIO-GPU and Panfrost DRM drivers

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com
Thu Feb 16 13:08:45 UTC 2023


Il 16/02/23 13:15, Daniel Vetter ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 03:02:10PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 1/27/23 11:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:55:09AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> Hello Thomas and Gerd,
>>>>
>>>> On 1/9/23 00:04, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> This series:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Makes minor fixes for drm_gem_lru and Panfrost
>>>>>    2. Brings refactoring for older code
>>>>>    3. Adds common drm-shmem memory shrinker
>>>>>    4. Enables shrinker for VirtIO-GPU driver
>>>>>    5. Switches Panfrost driver to the common shrinker
>>>>>
>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>
>>>>> v10:- Rebased on a recent linux-next.
>>>>>
>>>>>      - Added Rob's ack to MSM "Prevent blocking within shrinker loop" patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>      - Added Steven's ack/r-b/t-b for the Panfrost patches.
>>>>>
>>>>>      - Fixed missing export of the new drm_gem_object_evict() function.
>>>>>
>>>>>      - Added fixes tags to the first two patches that are making minor fixes,
>>>>>        for consistency.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have comments on this version? Otherwise ack will be appreciated.
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Don't feel like signing off on the locking changes, I'm not that
>>> familiar with the drm locking rules.  So someone else looking at them
>>> would be good.  Otherwise the series and specifically the virtio changes
>>> look good to me.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
>>
>> Thomas was looking at the the DRM core changes. I expect he'll ack them.
>>
>> Thank you for reviewing the virtio patches!
> 


> I think best-case would be an ack from msm people that this looks good
> (even better a conversion for msm to start using this).
> 

Dmitry B, Konrad, can you please help with this one?

Thanks!

Regards,
Angelo

> Otherwise I think the locking looks reasonable, I think the tricky bits
> have been moving the dma-buf rules, but if you want I can try to take
> another in-depth look. But would need to be in 2 weeks since I'm going on
> vacations, pls ping me on irc if I'm needed.
> 
> Otherwise would be great if we can land this soon, so that it can soak the
> entire linux-next cycle to catch any driver specific issues.
> -Daniel



More information about the dri-devel mailing list