[PATCH v6 03/11] dt-bindings: display/msm: add sm8350 and sm8450 DSI PHYs
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Fri Jan 6 15:42:14 UTC 2023
On 06/01/2023 17:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/12/2022 02:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> SM8350 and SM8450 platforms use the same driver and same bindings as the
>> existing 7nm DSI PHYs. Add corresponding compatibility strings.
>>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> index c851770bbdf2..bffd161fedfd 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ allOf:
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> enum:
>> + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350
>> + - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450
>
> If this patch was not merged (so far nothing in next), can we make it
> proper SoC compatible?
Ack. Bjorn has merged the dtsi bits, but I'll send a fixup.
>
> qcom,sm8450-dsi-phy-5nm
>
> The SC7280 already uses such pattern.
>
>> - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm
>> - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150
>> - qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list