[PATCH v2 12/13] drm/bridge: lt9611: stop filtering modes via the table

[Neil Armstrong]

On 08/01/2023 17:56, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The lt9611 bridge can support different modes, it makes no sense to list
> them in the table. Drop the table and check the number of interfaces
> using the fixed value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c | 41 +++----------------------
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c
> index 82af1f954cc6..df9f015aa3a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c
> @@ -84,24 +84,6 @@ static const struct regmap_config lt9611_regmap_config = {
>   	.num_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(lt9611_ranges),
>   };
>   
> -struct lt9611_mode {
> -	u16 hdisplay;
> -	u16 vdisplay;
> -	u8 vrefresh;
> -	u8 lanes;
> -	u8 intfs;
> -};
> -
> -static struct lt9611_mode lt9611_modes[] = {
> -	{ 3840, 2160, 30, 4, 2 }, /* 3840x2160 24bit 30Hz 4Lane 2ports */
> -	{ 1920, 1080, 60, 4, 1 }, /* 1080P 24bit 60Hz 4lane 1port */
> -	{ 1920, 1080, 30, 3, 1 }, /* 1080P 24bit 30Hz 3lane 1port */
> -	{ 1920, 1080, 24, 3, 1 },
> -	{ 720, 480, 60, 4, 1 },
> -	{ 720, 576, 50, 2, 1 },
> -	{ 640, 480, 60, 2, 1 },
> -};
> -
>   static struct lt9611 *bridge_to_lt9611(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>   {
>   	return container_of(bridge, struct lt9611, bridge);
> @@ -603,21 +585,6 @@ static int lt9611_regulator_enable(struct lt9611 *lt9611)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static struct lt9611_mode *lt9611_find_mode(const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> -{
> -	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lt9611_modes); i++) {
> -		if (lt9611_modes[i].hdisplay == mode->hdisplay &&
> -		    lt9611_modes[i].vdisplay == mode->vdisplay &&
> -		    lt9611_modes[i].vrefresh == drm_mode_vrefresh(mode)) {
> -			return &lt9611_modes[i];
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	return NULL;
> -}
> -
>   static enum drm_connector_status lt9611_bridge_detect(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>   {
>   	struct lt9611 *lt9611 = bridge_to_lt9611(bridge);
> @@ -832,12 +799,12 @@ static enum drm_mode_status lt9611_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>   						     const struct drm_display_info *info,
>   						     const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>   {
> -	struct lt9611_mode *lt9611_mode = lt9611_find_mode(mode);
>   	struct lt9611 *lt9611 = bridge_to_lt9611(bridge);
>   
> -	if (!lt9611_mode)
> -		return MODE_BAD;
> -	else if (lt9611_mode->intfs > 1 && !lt9611->dsi1)
> +	if (mode->hdisplay >= 3840 && drm_mode_vrefresh(mode) >= 31)

Isn't 31 a typo ?

> +		return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> +
> +	if (mode->hdisplay > 2000 && !lt9611->dsi1_node)
>   		return MODE_PANEL;
>   	else
>   		return MODE_OK;