[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Allow error capture of a pending request
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 12 10:06:41 UTC 2023
On 12/01/2023 02:53, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>
> A hang situation has been observed where the only requests on the
> context were either completed or not yet started according to the
> breaadcrumbs. However, the register state claimed a batch was (maybe)
> in progress. So, allow capture of the pending request on the grounds
> that this might be better than nothing.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index bd2cf7d235df0..2e338a9667a4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -1628,11 +1628,9 @@ capture_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> if (ce) {
> intel_engine_clear_hung_context(engine);
> rq = intel_context_find_active_request(ce);
> - if (rq && !i915_request_started(rq)) {
> - drm_info(&engine->gt->i915->drm, "Got hung context on %s with no active request!\n",
> - engine->name);
> - rq = NULL;
> - }
> + if (rq && !i915_request_started(rq))
> + drm_info(&engine->gt->i915->drm, "Confused - active request not yet started: %lld:%lld, ce = 0x%04X/%s!\n",
> + rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno, ce->guc_id.id, engine->name);
Ah you change active to started in this patch! :)
I suggest no "ce" in user visible messages and maybe stick with the
convention grep suggest is already established:
"Hung context with active request %lld:%lld [0x%04X] not started!"
Regards,
Tvrtko
> } else {
> /*
> * Getting here with GuC enabled means it is a forced error capture
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list