[PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: add hw revision 410

Richard Acayan mailingradian at gmail.com
Fri Jan 13 03:56:34 UTC 2023


On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 08:54:20PM -0500, Richard Acayan wrote:
> The Snapdragon 670 uses similar clocks (with one frequency added) to the
> Snapdragon 845 but reports DPU revision 4.1.0. Add support for this DPU
> with configuration from the Pixel 3a downstream kernel.
>
> Link: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/368478b0ae76566927a2769a2bf24dfe7f38bb78/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670-sde.dtsi
> Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian at gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c    | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> index 0f3da480b066..6a077a9ef7a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> @@ -504,6 +504,25 @@ static const struct dpu_mdp_cfg msm8998_mdp[] = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> +static const struct dpu_mdp_cfg sdm670_mdp[] = {
> +	{
> +	.name = "top_0", .id = MDP_TOP,
> +	.base = 0x0, .len = 0x45C,
> +	.features = BIT(DPU_MDP_AUDIO_SELECT),
> +	.highest_bank_bit = 0x1,
> +	.clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0] = {
> +			.reg_off = 0x2AC, .bit_off = 0},
> +	.clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG1] = {
> +			.reg_off = 0x2B4, .bit_off = 0},
> +	.clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA0] = {
> +			.reg_off = 0x2AC, .bit_off = 8},
> +	.clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR0] = {
> +			.reg_off = 0x2B4, .bit_off = 8},
> +	.clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR1] = {
> +			.reg_off = 0x2BC, .bit_off = 8},
> +	},
> +};
> +
>  static const struct dpu_mdp_cfg sdm845_mdp[] = {
>  	{
>  	.name = "top_0", .id = MDP_TOP,
> @@ -1154,6 +1173,11 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_1 = _DMA_SBLK("9", 2);
>  static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_2 = _DMA_SBLK("10", 3);
>  static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_3 = _DMA_SBLK("11", 4);
>  
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm670_vig_sblk_0 =
> +				_VIG_SBLK("0", 4, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm670_vig_sblk_1 =
> +				_VIG_SBLK("1", 5, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
> +
>  #define SSPP_BLK(_name, _id, _base, _features, \
>  		_sblk, _xinid, _type, _clkctrl) \
>  	{ \
> @@ -1185,6 +1209,19 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg msm8998_sspp[] = {
>  		sdm845_dma_sblk_3, 13, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR1),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sdm670_sspp[] = {
> +	SSPP_BLK("sspp_0", SSPP_VIG0, 0x4000, VIG_SDM845_MASK,
> +		sdm670_vig_sblk_0, 0,  SSPP_TYPE_VIG, DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0),
> +	SSPP_BLK("sspp_1", SSPP_VIG1, 0x6000, VIG_SDM845_MASK,
> +		sdm670_vig_sblk_1, 4,  SSPP_TYPE_VIG, DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG1),
> +	SSPP_BLK("sspp_8", SSPP_DMA0, 0x24000,  DMA_SDM845_MASK,
> +		sdm845_dma_sblk_0, 1, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA0),
> +	SSPP_BLK("sspp_9", SSPP_DMA1, 0x26000,  DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK,
> +		sdm845_dma_sblk_1, 5, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR0),
> +	SSPP_BLK("sspp_10", SSPP_DMA2, 0x28000,  DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK,
> +		sdm845_dma_sblk_2, 9, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR1),
> +};
> +
>  static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sdm845_sspp[] = {
>  	SSPP_BLK("sspp_0", SSPP_VIG0, 0x4000, VIG_SDM845_MASK,
>  		sdm845_vig_sblk_0, 0,  SSPP_TYPE_VIG, DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0),
> @@ -1832,6 +1869,11 @@ static struct dpu_dsc_cfg sm8150_dsc[] = {
>  	DSC_BLK("dsc_3", DSC_3, 0x80c00, BIT(DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL)),
>  };
>  
> +static struct dpu_dsc_cfg sdm670_dsc[] = {
> +	DSC_BLK("dsc_0", DSC_0, 0x80000),
> +	DSC_BLK("dsc_1", DSC_1, 0x80400),
I remember changing this, but it seems the compiler error is still here. Sorry
for that.

> +};
> +
>  /*************************************************************
>   * INTF sub blocks config
>   *************************************************************/
> @@ -2533,6 +2575,30 @@ static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg msm8998_dpu_cfg = {
>  	.mdss_irqs = IRQ_SM8250_MASK,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg sdm670_dpu_cfg = {
> +	.caps = &sdm845_dpu_caps,
> +	.mdp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_mdp),
> +	.mdp = sdm670_mdp,
> +	.ctl_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_ctl),
> +	.ctl = sdm845_ctl,
> +	.sspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_sspp),
> +	.sspp = sdm670_sspp,
> +	.mixer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_lm),
> +	.mixer = sdm845_lm,
> +	.pingpong_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_pp),
> +	.pingpong = sdm845_pp,
> +	.dsc_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_dsc),
> +	.dsc = sdm670_dsc,
> +	.intf_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_intf),
> +	.intf = sdm845_intf,
> +	.vbif_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_vbif),
> +	.vbif = sdm845_vbif,
> +	.reg_dma_count = 1,
> +	.dma_cfg = &sdm845_regdma,
> +	.perf = &sdm845_perf_data,
> +	.mdss_irqs = IRQ_SDM845_MASK,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg sdm845_dpu_cfg = {
>  	.caps = &sdm845_dpu_caps,
>  	.mdp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_mdp),
> @@ -2840,6 +2906,7 @@ static const struct dpu_mdss_hw_cfg_handler cfg_handler[] = {
>  	{ .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_301, .dpu_cfg = &msm8998_dpu_cfg},
>  	{ .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_400, .dpu_cfg = &sdm845_dpu_cfg},
>  	{ .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_401, .dpu_cfg = &sdm845_dpu_cfg},
> +	{ .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_410, .dpu_cfg = &sdm670_dpu_cfg},
>  	{ .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_500, .dpu_cfg = &sm8150_dpu_cfg},
>  	{ .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_501, .dpu_cfg = &sm8150_dpu_cfg},
>  	{ .hw_rev = DPU_HW_VER_510, .dpu_cfg = &sc8180x_dpu_cfg},
> -- 
> 2.39.0
>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list