[2/2] drm/msm/dpu: don't use DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSORn for DMA SSPP clocks

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 24/01/2023 12:13, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-01-15 14:41:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> DPU driver has been using the DPU_CLK_CTRL_CURSOR prefix for the DMA
>> SSPP blocks used for the cursor planes. This has lead to the confusion
>> at least for the MSM8998 platform. In preparation to supporting the
>> cursor SSPP blocks, use proper enum values to index DMA SSPP clock
>> controls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org> # on SM8550 on top of next-20230116
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten at somainline.org>
> 
> One question follows...
> 
>> ---
>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c    | 64 +++++++++----------
>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h    |  2 +
>>   2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> index ad0c55464154..b0f6e071fe4b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> <snip>
>> @@ -1199,9 +1199,9 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sdm845_sspp[] = {
>>   	SSPP_BLK("sspp_9", SSPP_DMA1, 0x26000,  DMA_SDM845_MASK,
>>   		sdm845_dma_sblk_1, 5, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA1),
>>   	SSPP_BLK("sspp_10", SSPP_DMA2, 0x28000,  DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK,
> 
> Are these DMA pipes with CURSOR support, or how should I see this?  For
> MSM8998 I suggested to remove the _CURSOR bit since it has two dedicated
> cursor pipes (not yet represented in the catalog) but these SoCs don't
> seem to have those.
>

As I wrote earlier, this part just marks them to be used for HW cursor 
support.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry