[PATCH v6 4/4] drm/msm: stop storing the array of CRTCs in struct msm_drm_private
Abhinav Kumar
quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Wed Jan 25 02:14:31 UTC 2023
On 6/17/2022 4:33 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The array of CRTC in the struct msm_drm_private duplicates a list of
> CRTCs in the drm_device. Drop it and use the existing list for CRTC
> enumeration.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 44 +++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h | 3 +-
> 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> index e23e2552e802..e79f0a8817ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int _dpu_kms_drm_obj_init(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms)
> ret = PTR_ERR(crtc);
> return ret;
> }
> - priv->crtcs[priv->num_crtcs++] = crtc;
> + priv->num_crtcs++;
> }
>
> /* All CRTCs are compatible with all encoders */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c
> index fb48c8c19ec3..7449c1693e45 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int modeset_init(struct mdp4_kms *mdp4_kms)
> goto fail;
> }
>
> - priv->crtcs[priv->num_crtcs++] = crtc;
> + priv->num_crtcs++;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c
> index 3d5621a68f85..36808990f840 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp5/mdp5_kms.c
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int modeset_init(struct mdp5_kms *mdp5_kms)
> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev, "failed to construct crtc %d (%d)\n", i, ret);
> goto fail;
> }
> - priv->crtcs[priv->num_crtcs++] = crtc;
> + priv->num_crtcs++;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> index 1aab6bf86278..567e77dae43b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static void msm_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> struct msm_vblank_work {
> struct work_struct work;
> - int crtc_id;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> bool enable;
> struct msm_drm_private *priv;
> };
> @@ -162,15 +162,15 @@ static void vblank_ctrl_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> struct msm_kms *kms = priv->kms;
>
Is there any chance of vbl_work->crtc becoming NULL before this gets
executed?
So do we need to protect this like
if (vbl_work->enable && vbl_work->crtc)
Because the layers below this dont seem to have NULL protection.
> if (vbl_work->enable)
> - kms->funcs->enable_vblank(kms, priv->crtcs[vbl_work->crtc_id]);
> + kms->funcs->enable_vblank(kms, vbl_work->crtc);
> else
> - kms->funcs->disable_vblank(kms, priv->crtcs[vbl_work->crtc_id]);
> + kms->funcs->disable_vblank(kms, vbl_work->crtc);
>
> kfree(vbl_work);
> }
>
> static int vblank_ctrl_queue_work(struct msm_drm_private *priv,
> - int crtc_id, bool enable)
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool enable)
> {
> struct msm_vblank_work *vbl_work;
>
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int vblank_ctrl_queue_work(struct msm_drm_private *priv,
>
> INIT_WORK(&vbl_work->work, vblank_ctrl_worker);
>
> - vbl_work->crtc_id = crtc_id;
> + vbl_work->crtc = crtc;
> vbl_work->enable = enable;
> vbl_work->priv = priv;
>
> @@ -354,7 +354,8 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct drm_driver *drv)
> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct drm_device *ddev;
> struct msm_kms *kms;
> - int ret, i;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> + int ret;
>
> if (drm_firmware_drivers_only())
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -427,20 +428,23 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct drm_driver *drv)
> ddev->mode_config.funcs = &mode_config_funcs;
> ddev->mode_config.helper_private = &mode_config_helper_funcs;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_crtcs; i++) {
> + drm_for_each_crtc(crtc, ddev) {
> + struct msm_drm_thread *ev_thread;
> +
> /* initialize event thread */
> - priv->event_thread[i].crtc_id = priv->crtcs[i]->base.id;
> - priv->event_thread[i].dev = ddev;
> - priv->event_thread[i].worker = kthread_create_worker(0,
> - "crtc_event:%d", priv->event_thread[i].crtc_id);
> - if (IS_ERR(priv->event_thread[i].worker)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->event_thread[i].worker);
> + ev_thread = &priv->event_thread[drm_crtc_index(crtc)];
> + ev_thread->crtc = crtc;
> + ev_thread->dev = ddev;
> + ev_thread->worker = kthread_create_worker(0,
> + "crtc_event:%d", ev_thread->crtc->base.id);
Please correct me if wrong.
Today, other than just populating the name for the worker is the
ev_thread->crtc used anywhere?
If so, can we just drop crtc from msm_drm_thread and while creating the
worker just use kthread_create_worker(0, "crtc_event:%d", crtc->base.id);
> + if (IS_ERR(ev_thread->worker)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ev_thread->worker);
> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to create crtc_event kthread\n");
> - priv->event_thread[i].worker = NULL;
> + ev_thread->worker = NULL;
> goto err_msm_uninit;
> }
>
> - sched_set_fifo(priv->event_thread[i].worker->task);
> + sched_set_fifo(ev_thread->worker->task);
> }
>
> ret = drm_vblank_init(ddev, priv->num_crtcs);
> @@ -563,25 +567,23 @@ static void msm_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> int msm_crtc_enable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> - unsigned int pipe = crtc->index;
> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct msm_kms *kms = priv->kms;
> if (!kms)
> return -ENXIO;
> - drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc=%u", pipe);
> - return vblank_ctrl_queue_work(priv, pipe, true);
> + drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc=%u", crtc->base.id);
> + return vblank_ctrl_queue_work(priv, crtc, true);
> }
>
> void msm_crtc_disable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> - unsigned int pipe = crtc->index;
> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct msm_kms *kms = priv->kms;
> if (!kms)
> return;
> - drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc=%u", pipe);
> - vblank_ctrl_queue_work(priv, pipe, false);
> + drm_dbg_vbl(dev, "crtc=%u", crtc->base.id);
> + vblank_ctrl_queue_work(priv, crtc, false);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> index 08388d742d65..0e98b6f161df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct msm_display_topology {
> /* Commit/Event thread specific structure */
> struct msm_drm_thread {
> struct drm_device *dev;
> - unsigned int crtc_id;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> struct kthread_worker *worker;
> };
>
> @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
> struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>
> unsigned int num_crtcs;
> - struct drm_crtc *crtcs[MAX_CRTCS];
>
> struct msm_drm_thread event_thread[MAX_CRTCS];
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list