[PATCH v2 03/27] drm/msm/dpu: move SSPP allocation to the RM
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Fri Jan 27 05:56:56 UTC 2023
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 01:29, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/29/2022 11:18 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Follow the example of all other hw blocks and initialize SSPP blocks in
> > Resource Manager.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 17 ++++-------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > index e1cdd71716f0..e443799de2c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > @@ -1275,8 +1275,6 @@ static void dpu_plane_destroy(struct drm_plane *plane)
> > /* this will destroy the states as well */
> > drm_plane_cleanup(plane);
> >
> > - dpu_hw_sspp_destroy(pdpu->pipe_hw);
> > -
> We removed from here so the flow will be msm_drm_uninit calls
> drm_mode_config_cleanup() which will call kms->destroy() which shall
> call dpu_rm_destroy() where this will be released now right?
Yes. _dpu_kms_hw_destroy() calls dpu_rm_destroy(), which destroys all
RM-allocated objects.
>
>
> > kfree(pdpu);
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -1482,14 +1480,10 @@ struct drm_plane *dpu_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > pdpu->pipe = pipe;
> >
> > /* initialize underlying h/w driver */
> > - pdpu->pipe_hw = dpu_hw_sspp_init(pipe, kms->mmio, kms->catalog);
> > - if (IS_ERR(pdpu->pipe_hw)) {
> > - DPU_ERROR("[%u]SSPP init failed\n", pipe);
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(pdpu->pipe_hw);
> > + pdpu->pipe_hw = dpu_rm_get_sspp(&kms->rm, pipe);
> > + if (!pdpu->pipe_hw || !pdpu->pipe_hw->cap || !pdpu->pipe_hw->cap->sblk) {
> > + DPU_ERROR("[%u]SSPP is invalid\n", pipe);
>
> I know this was existing code but can there be a case where pipe_hw->cap
> exists but pipe_hw->cap->sblk doesnt?
There is none up to now, granted that SSPP has a lot of extra data in
sblk. However, as you said, it's an existing code. No need to change
it here. And it's good as a safety net.
Granted that SRC offset is always 0, we can safely drop the src_sblk
and always access it via main register space.
>
> > goto clean_plane;
> > - } else if (!pdpu->pipe_hw->cap || !pdpu->pipe_hw->cap->sblk) {
> > - DPU_ERROR("[%u]SSPP init returned invalid cfg\n", pipe);
> > - goto clean_sspp;
> > }
> >
> > format_list = pdpu->pipe_hw->cap->sblk->format_list;
> > @@ -1499,7 +1493,7 @@ struct drm_plane *dpu_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > format_list, num_formats,
> > supported_format_modifiers, type, NULL);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto clean_sspp;
> > + goto clean_plane;
> >
> > pdpu->catalog = kms->catalog;
> >
> > @@ -1532,9 +1526,6 @@ struct drm_plane *dpu_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > pipe, plane->base.id);
> > return plane;
> >
> > -clean_sspp:
> > - if (pdpu && pdpu->pipe_hw)
> > - dpu_hw_sspp_destroy(pdpu->pipe_hw);
> > clean_plane:
> > kfree(pdpu);
> > return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> > index 73b3442e7467..0668009cc9ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > #include "dpu_hw_lm.h"
> > #include "dpu_hw_ctl.h"
> > #include "dpu_hw_pingpong.h"
> > +#include "dpu_hw_sspp.h"
> > #include "dpu_hw_intf.h"
> > #include "dpu_hw_wb.h"
> > #include "dpu_hw_dspp.h"
> > @@ -91,6 +92,9 @@ int dpu_rm_destroy(struct dpu_rm *rm)
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rm->hw_wb); i++)
> > dpu_hw_wb_destroy(rm->hw_wb[i]);
> >
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rm->hw_sspp); i++)
> > + dpu_hw_sspp_destroy(rm->hw_sspp[i]);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -255,6 +259,24 @@ int dpu_rm_init(struct dpu_rm *rm,
> > rm->dsc_blks[dsc->id - DSC_0] = &hw->base;
> > }
> >
> > + for (i = 0; i < cat->sspp_count; i++) {
> > + struct dpu_hw_sspp *hw;
> > + const struct dpu_sspp_cfg *sspp = &cat->sspp[i];
> > +
> > + if (sspp->id < SSPP_NONE || sspp->id >= SSPP_MAX) {
> > + DPU_ERROR("skip intf %d with invalid id\n", sspp->id);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + hw = dpu_hw_sspp_init(sspp->id, mmio, cat);
> > + if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> > + rc = PTR_ERR(hw);
> > + DPU_ERROR("failed sspp object creation: err %d\n", rc);
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > + rm->hw_sspp[sspp->id - SSPP_NONE] = hw;
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > fail:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h
> > index 59de72b381f9..d62c2edb2460 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct dpu_global_state;
> > * @hw_intf: array of intf hardware resources
> > * @hw_wb: array of wb hardware resources
> > * @dspp_blks: array of dspp hardware resources
> > + * @hw_sspp: array of sspp hardware resources
> > */
> > struct dpu_rm {
> > struct dpu_hw_blk *pingpong_blks[PINGPONG_MAX - PINGPONG_0];
> > @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ struct dpu_rm {
> > struct dpu_hw_blk *dspp_blks[DSPP_MAX - DSPP_0];
> > struct dpu_hw_blk *merge_3d_blks[MERGE_3D_MAX - MERGE_3D_0];
> > struct dpu_hw_blk *dsc_blks[DSC_MAX - DSC_0];
> > + struct dpu_hw_sspp *hw_sspp[SSPP_MAX - SSPP_NONE];
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -108,5 +110,15 @@ static inline struct dpu_hw_wb *dpu_rm_get_wb(struct dpu_rm *rm, enum dpu_wb wb_
> > return rm->hw_wb[wb_idx - WB_0];
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * dpu_rm_get_sspp - Return a struct dpu_hw_sspp instance given it's index.
> > + * @rm: DPU Resource Manager handle
> > + * @sspp_idx: SSPP index
> > + */
> > +static inline struct dpu_hw_sspp *dpu_rm_get_sspp(struct dpu_rm *rm, enum dpu_sspp sspp_idx)
> > +{
> > + return rm->hw_sspp[sspp_idx - SSPP_NONE];
> > +}
> > +
> > #endif /* __DPU_RM_H__ */
> >
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list