[PATCH] backlight: ktz8866: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 10:14:09PM +0800, Jianhua Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 02:32:39PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 08:36:28AM +0800, Jianhua Lu wrote:
> > > I prefer that you pack this commit to the i2c-tree commit that drops
> > > old .probe(). 
> > 
> > That's fine for me. Can I interpret this as an Ack for this patch?
> 
> Yes, but can't get my A-b directly, this patch should be ignored and 
> resend it within the i2c-tree patch series or split it to two patch
> series.

I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Up to know I though you want
the patch as is go in together with the patch that modifies struct
i2c_driver such that the PR has in two separate commits:

	i2c: Modify .probe() to not take an id parameter
	backlight: ktz8866: Convert to i2c's .probe_new()

Did I understand that right?

In that case an Ack by you would be fine and welcome.

I don't want to squash the changes to the ktz8866 driver into the patch
that modifies struct i2c_driver, as this needlessly clutters the commit,
if it's that what you wanted. (There are more than 1000 i2c drivers and
the others are not converted in a single lockstep, too.)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20230128/4ae17609/attachment.sig>