drm/drm_gem.c: Remove surplus else after return

[Sui Jingfeng]

Hi,  Thomas


On 2023/6/22 18:18, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> else is not generally useful after return
>
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng at loongson.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 1a5a2cd0d4ec..c18686f434d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -1150,8 +1150,8 @@ int drm_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>   {
>   	if (obj->funcs->pin)
>   		return obj->funcs->pin(obj);
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   void drm_gem_unpin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)


I have merge this patch with the dim tool, by using the following command,


  ./dim push-branch drm-misc-next


Is this looks fine?

I'm so worry about the dim tool now.

I want to make sure if I do the things correctly.