[PATCH v3 09/11] drm/msm/dpu: core_perf: remove extra clk_round_rate() call

Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Wed Jul 12 19:43:47 UTC 2023



On 7/7/2023 12:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The dev_pm_opp_set_rate() already contains a call for clk_round_rate for
> the passed value. Stop calling it manually from
> _dpu_core_perf_get_core_clk_rate(). It is slightly incorrect to call it
> this way, as we should round the final calculated clock rate rather than
> rounding all the intermediate values.
> 

Change is alright but do we really need a core_perf tag on the subject line?

> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c | 2 --
>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> index afd75750380c..a570810c9254 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> @@ -299,8 +299,6 @@ static u64 _dpu_core_perf_get_core_clk_rate(struct dpu_kms *kms)
>   			dpu_cstate = to_dpu_crtc_state(crtc->state);
>   			clk_rate = max(dpu_cstate->new_perf.core_clk_rate,
>   							clk_rate);
> -			clk_rate = clk_round_rate(kms->perf.core_clk,
> -					clk_rate);
>   		}
>   	}
>   


More information about the dri-devel mailing list