[PATCH v3 09/11] drm/msm/dpu: core_perf: remove extra clk_round_rate() call
Abhinav Kumar
quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Wed Jul 12 19:43:47 UTC 2023
On 7/7/2023 12:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The dev_pm_opp_set_rate() already contains a call for clk_round_rate for
> the passed value. Stop calling it manually from
> _dpu_core_perf_get_core_clk_rate(). It is slightly incorrect to call it
> this way, as we should round the final calculated clock rate rather than
> rounding all the intermediate values.
>
Change is alright but do we really need a core_perf tag on the subject line?
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> index afd75750380c..a570810c9254 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_core_perf.c
> @@ -299,8 +299,6 @@ static u64 _dpu_core_perf_get_core_clk_rate(struct dpu_kms *kms)
> dpu_cstate = to_dpu_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> clk_rate = max(dpu_cstate->new_perf.core_clk_rate,
> clk_rate);
> - clk_rate = clk_round_rate(kms->perf.core_clk,
> - clk_rate);
> }
> }
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list