[PATCH 2/6] PCI/VGA: Deal with PCI VGA compatible devices only
Sui Jingfeng
sui.jingfeng at linux.dev
Wed Jul 19 19:58:36 UTC 2023
Hi,
On 2023/7/20 02:26, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 09:43:50PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
[...]
>> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello at amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng at loongson.cn>
> I do not see Mario's Reviewed-by on the list. I do see Mario's
> Reviewed-by [2] for a previous version, but that version added this in
> pci_notify():
>
> + if (pdev->class != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA << 8)
> + return 0;
>
> while this version adds:
>
> + if ((pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA)
> + return 0;
>
> It's OK to carry a review to future versions if there are
> insignificant changes, but this is a functional change that seems
> significant to me. The first matches only 0x030000, while the second
> discards the low eight bits so it matches 0x0300XX.
Yes, you are right.
But I suddenly realized that this may deserve another patch, desperate
trivial.
What this version adds here is *same* before this patch set is applied.
My explanation about the minor tweak being made before this version and
previous version
is that I want to keep my patch *less distraction*.
The major functional gains(benefit) is that we filter non VGA compatible
devices out.
As a start point, I should keep one patch do one thing (do one thing and
do it well).
On the other hand, even though the lest significant 8 but if pdev->class
is really matter.
I think I still need to wait the things(a bug emerged, for example)
became clear.
Instead of cleanup all potential problems with obvious motivation.
I think Mario will accept my explanation.
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718231400.GA496927@bhelgaas
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/5b6fdf65-b354-94a9-f883-be820157efad@amd.com/
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/vgaarb.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/vgaarb.c b/drivers/pci/vgaarb.c
>> index c1bc6c983932..021116ed61cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/vgaarb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/vgaarb.c
>> @@ -754,10 +754,6 @@ static bool vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> struct pci_dev *bridge;
>> u16 cmd;
>>
>> - /* Only deal with VGA class devices */
>> - if ((pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA)
>> - return false;
>> -
>> /* Allocate structure */
>> vgadev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vga_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (vgadev == NULL) {
>> @@ -1502,6 +1498,10 @@ static int pci_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
>>
>> vgaarb_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>>
>> + /* Deal with VGA compatible devices only */
>> + if ((pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> /* For now we're only intereted in devices added and removed. I didn't
>> * test this thing here, so someone needs to double check for the
>> * cases of hotplugable vga cards. */
>> @@ -1534,8 +1534,8 @@ static struct miscdevice vga_arb_device = {
>>
>> static int __init vga_arb_device_init(void)
>> {
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>> int rc;
>> - struct pci_dev *pdev;
>>
>> rc = misc_register(&vga_arb_device);
>> if (rc < 0)
>> @@ -1543,13 +1543,14 @@ static int __init vga_arb_device_init(void)
>>
>> bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &pci_notifier);
>>
>> - /* We add all PCI devices satisfying VGA class in the arbiter by
>> - * default */
>> - pdev = NULL;
>> - while ((pdev =
>> - pci_get_subsys(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
>> - PCI_ANY_ID, pdev)) != NULL)
>> - vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(pdev);
>> + /*
>> + * We add all PCI VGA compatible devices in the arbiter by default
>> + */
>> + do {
>> + pdev = pci_get_class(PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA << 8, pdev);
>> + if (pdev)
>> + vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(pdev);
>> + } while (pdev);
>>
>> pr_info("loaded\n");
>> return rc;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list