[PATCH][next] accel/qaic: remove redundant assignment to pointer pexec

[Colin King (gmail)]

On 26/07/2023 14:38, Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/26/2023 8:30 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> On 7/25/2023 5:40 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
>>> Pointer pexec is being assigned a value however it is never read. The
>>> assignment is redundant and can be removed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c | 1 -
>>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c 
>>> b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
>>> index e9a1cb779b30..8a6cb14f490e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
>>> @@ -1320,7 +1320,6 @@ static int __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl(struct 
>>> drm_device *dev, void *data, struct dr
>>>       user_data = u64_to_user_ptr(args->data);
>>>       exec = kcalloc(args->hdr.count, size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> -    pexec = (struct qaic_partial_execute_entry *)exec;
>>>       if (!exec)
>>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> It does look like pexec is not used in this function after it was 
>> refactored.  Shouldn't the declaration at the beginning of the 
>> function also be removed?
> 
> Yeah we should remove the declaration as well. Although it is used some 
> where to calculate its size i.e. sizeof(*pexec). We need to directly use 
> the type in sizeof() i.e. sizeof(struct qaic_partial_execute_entry).

I didn't remove the variable because of the sizeof(), but it makes sense 
to remove it. I'll send a V2 today