[PATCH 6/7] drm/msm/dpu: drop useless check from dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_te_rd_ptr_irq()

Marijn Suijten marijn.suijten at somainline.org
Thu Jul 27 20:16:27 UTC 2023


On 2023-07-27 19:21:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_te_rd_ptr_irq() function uses neither hw_intf
> nor hw_pp data, so we can drop the corresponding check.

Maybe because it would catch "bogus" interrupts, or these blocks are
accessed somewhere down the line in the vblank callback chain?  I have
no clue :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten at somainline.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> index 60d4dd88725e..04a1106101a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> @@ -108,14 +108,6 @@ static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_te_rd_ptr_irq(void *arg)
>  	struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc = arg;
>  	struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd *cmd_enc;
>  
> -	if (phys_enc->has_intf_te) {
> -		if (!phys_enc->hw_intf)
> -			return;
> -	} else {
> -		if (!phys_enc->hw_pp)
> -			return;
> -	}
> -
>  	DPU_ATRACE_BEGIN("rd_ptr_irq");
>  	cmd_enc = to_dpu_encoder_phys_cmd(phys_enc);
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 


More information about the dri-devel mailing list