[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v15 0/1] drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Jun 5 09:16:22 UTC 2023


On 05/06/2023 09:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 31/05/2023 18:10, fei.yang at intel.com wrote:
>> From: Fei Yang <fei.yang at intel.com>
>>
>> This series introduce a new extension for GEM_CREATE,
>> 1. end support for set caching ioctl [PATCH 1/2]
>> 2. add set_pat extension for gem_create [PATCH 2/2]
>>
>> v2: drop one patch that was merged separately
>>      commit 341ad0e8e254 ("drm/i915/mtl: Add PTE encode function")
>> v3: rebased on https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/117082/
>> v4: fix missing unlock introduced in v3, and
>>      solve a rebase conflict
>> v5: replace obj->cache_level with pat_set_by_user,
>>      fix i915_cache_level_str() for legacy platforms.
>> v6: rebased on https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/117480/
>> v7: rebased on https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/117528/
>> v8: dropped the two dependent patches that has been merged
>>      separately. Add IGT link and Tested-by (MESA).
>> v9: addressing comments (Andi)
>> v10: acked-by and tested-by MESA
>> v11: drop "end support for set caching ioctl" (merged)
>>       remove tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
>> v12: drop Bspec reference in comment. add to commit message instead
>> v13: sent to test with igt at gem_create@create-ext-set-pat
>> v14: sent to test with igt at gem_create@create-ext-set-pat
>> v15: update commit message with documentation note and t-b/a-b from
>>       Media driver folks.
>>
>> Fei Yang (1):
>>    drm/i915: Allow user to set cache at BO creation
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c |  6 ++++
>>   include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h                | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> Try with:
> 
> Test-with: 20230526172221.1438998-1-fei.yang at intel.com
> 
> That is how it is supposed to be done, to do a CI run against a test 
> case not yet merged that is.

Or I see that IGT has been since merged so you probably have results 
already?

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the dri-devel mailing list