[Intel-xe] [RFC 2/5] drm/xe/RAS: Register a genl netlink family
Iddamsetty, Aravind
aravind.iddamsetty at intel.com
Mon Jun 5 17:21:51 UTC 2023
On 04-06-2023 22:39, Tomer Tayar wrote:
> On 26/05/2023 19:20, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
>> Use the generic netlink(genl) subsystem to expose the RAS counters to
>> userspace. We define a family structure and operations and register to
>> genl subsystem and these callbacks will be invoked by genl subsystem when
>> userspace sends a registered command with a family identifier to genl
>> subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 3 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.h | 14 +++++
>> 6 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> index b84e191ba14f..2b42165bc824 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
>> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
>> xe_mmio.o \
>> xe_mocs.o \
>> xe_module.o \
>> + xe_netlink.o \
>> xe_pat.o \
>> xe_pci.o \
>> xe_pcode.o \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> index 323356a44e7f..aa12ef12d9dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>> #include "xe_irq.h"
>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>> #include "xe_module.h"
>> +#include "xe_netlink.h"
>> #include "xe_pcode.h"
>> #include "xe_pm.h"
>> #include "xe_query.h"
>> @@ -317,6 +318,8 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>>
>> xe_display_register(xe);
>>
>> + xe_genl_register(xe);
>
> xe_genl_register() can fail
That is right but I didn't want to fail the driver load as it would not
impact any device functionality but doesn't provide observability. hence
a warning would be printed "xe genl family registration failed".
>
>> +
>> xe_debugfs_register(xe);
>>
>> err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_device_sanitize, xe);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>> index 682ebdd1c09e..c9612a54c48f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>
>> #include <drm/drm_device.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_file.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_netlink.h>
>> #include <drm/ttm/ttm_device.h>
>>
>> #include "xe_gt_types.h"
>> @@ -347,6 +348,7 @@ struct xe_device {
>> u32 lvds_channel_mode;
>> } params;
>> #endif
>> + struct genl_family xe_genl_family;
>
> Should it be added above, before the "private" section?
> Maybe add a kernel-doc comment for it?
thanks for pointing out will move it there.
>
>> };
>>
>> /**
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
>> index 6860586ce7f8..1eb73eb9a9a5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include "xe_drv.h"
>> #include "xe_hw_fence.h"
>> #include "xe_module.h"
>> +#include "xe_netlink.h"
>> #include "xe_pci.h"
>> #include "xe_sched_job.h"
>>
>> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ static void __exit xe_exit(void)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> + xe_genl_cleanup();
>> xe_unregister_pci_driver();
>>
>> for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(init_funcs) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..63ef238ebc27
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_managed.h>
>> +
>> +#include "xe_device.h"
>> +
>> +DEFINE_XARRAY(xe_xarray);
>
> xe_array sounds too generic. Maybe it should be more specific like
> xe_genl_xarray?
> In addition, it should be probably static.
Ok.
Thanks,
Aravind.
>
> Thanks,
> Tomer
>
>> +
>> +static int xe_genl_list_errors(struct sk_buff *msg, struct genl_info *info)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_genl_read_error(struct sk_buff *msg, struct genl_info *info)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* operations definition */
>> +static const struct genl_ops xe_genl_ops[] = {
>> + {
>> + .cmd = DRM_CMD_QUERY,
>> + .doit = xe_genl_list_errors,
>> + .policy = drm_attr_policy_query,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .cmd = DRM_CMD_READ_ONE,
>> + .doit = xe_genl_read_error,
>> + .policy = drm_attr_policy_read_one,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .cmd = DRM_CMD_READ_ALL,
>> + .doit = xe_genl_list_errors,
>> + .policy = drm_attr_policy_query,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void xe_genl_deregister(struct drm_device *dev, void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct xe_device *xe = arg;
>> +
>> + xa_erase(&xe_xarray, xe->xe_genl_family.id);
>> +
>> + drm_dbg_driver(&xe->drm, "unregistering genl family %s\n", xe->xe_genl_family.name);
>> +
>> + genl_unregister_family(&xe->xe_genl_family);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void xe_genl_family_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>> +{
>> + /* Use drm primary node name eg: card0 to name the genl family */
>> + snprintf(xe->xe_genl_family.name, sizeof(xe->xe_genl_family.name), "%s", xe->drm.primary->kdev->kobj.name);
>> + xe->xe_genl_family.version = DRM_GENL_VERSION;
>> + xe->xe_genl_family.parallel_ops = true;
>> + xe->xe_genl_family.ops = xe_genl_ops;
>> + xe->xe_genl_family.n_ops = ARRAY_SIZE(xe_genl_ops);
>> + xe->xe_genl_family.maxattr = DRM_ATTR_MAX;
>> + xe->xe_genl_family.module = THIS_MODULE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int xe_genl_register(struct xe_device *xe)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + xe_genl_family_init(xe);
>> +
>> + ret = genl_register_family(&xe->xe_genl_family);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "xe genl family registration failed\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + drm_dbg_driver(&xe->drm, "genl family id %d and name %s\n", xe->xe_genl_family.id, xe->xe_genl_family.name);
>> +
>> + xa_store(&xe_xarray, xe->xe_genl_family.id, xe, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_genl_deregister, xe);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void xe_genl_cleanup(void)
>> +{
>> + /* destroy xarray */
>> + xa_destroy(&xe_xarray);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..3bbddb620539
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_netlink.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2021 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _XE_GENL_H_
>> +#define _XE_GENL_H_
>> +
>> +#include "xe_device.h"
>> +
>> +int xe_genl_register(struct xe_device *xe);
>> +void xe_genl_cleanup(void);
>> +
>> +#endif
>
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list