[PATCH v9 0/8] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_* macros

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Wed Jun 7 04:30:41 UTC 2023


On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:47:50PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 23:19:28 +0530, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The idea would be to include the drm_print_deprecated.h header in
> > drivers that still use the deprecated macros.
> 
> Yeah, what I meant was in a "first pass" kind of sense.
> 
> > > Not every file can be seen at a case-by-case basis or by coccinelle
> > > as far as I understand its usage. Consider the following:
> > > 
> > > DRM_INFO is used on line 210 of amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c, but the
> > > file does not even include drm_print.h directly. It includes the
> > > amdgpu.h header, which includes the amdgpu_ring.h header, which
> > > finally has the "#include " line.
> > > 
> > > If a simple find and replace has to be done, then that can be added
> > > at the end of the series.
> > 
> > Maybe a simple grep for the deprecated macros would be enough to
> > identify all the files that still use them ?
> 
> Hmm, so the drm_print_deprecated.h should be included individually on
> all the files, regardless of whether they include drm_print.h directly
> or not?
> 
> Actually that makes sense, so further inclusion of top-level header
> would not automatically include the deprecated macros.

That's the idea, yes. It would also clearly flag drivers that need to be
converted to the new macros.

> Since this needs some thought, I will be sending v10 without this.
> This change can be sent later separately, as it will anyways be a
> huge patch, and 10 is already a big enough revision number.

Sounds good to me.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


More information about the dri-devel mailing list