[PATCH V8 0/7] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Support variable clocking
Adam Ford
aford173 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 7 13:27:37 UTC 2023
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 8:15 AM Rasmus Villemoes
<rasmus.villemoes at prevas.dk> wrote:
>
> On 26/05/2023 05.05, Adam Ford wrote:
> > This series fixes the blanking pack size and the PMS calculation. It then
> > adds support to allows the DSIM to dynamically DPHY clocks, and support
> > non-burst mode while allowing the removal of the hard-coded clock values
> > for the PLL for imx8m mini/nano/plus, and it allows the removal of the
> > burst-clock device tree entry when burst-mode isn't supported by connected
> > devices like an HDMI brige. In that event, the HS clock is set to the
> > value requested by the bridge chip.
> >
> > This has been tested on both an i.MX8M Nano and i.MX8M Plus, and should
> > work on i.MX8M Mini as well. Marek Szyprowski has tested it on various
> > Exynos boards.
>
> Hi all
>
> We're testing this on top of v6.4-rc4 on our imx8mp board, which has a
> ti-sn65dsi86 DSI -> DisplayPort bridge. We do get an image at
> 1920x1200, but the monitor says it's only at 58Hz, and measuring on the
> DSI signals does seem to confirm that the update frequency is about 57.7
> or 57.8Hz (it's pretty hard to get a good measurement). It looks like
> it's the lines that are too long, by a time that corresponds to about 80
> pixels. But all the frontporch/backporch/hsync values look sane and
> completely standard for that resolution.
>
> Setting samsung,burst-clock-frequency explicitly to something large
> enough or letting it be derived from the 154MHz pixel clock makes no
> difference.
>
> Any ideas?
What refresh rate are you trying to achieve? It seems like 57.7 or
57.8 is really close to the 58 the Monitor states. I would expect the
refresh to be driven by whatever the monitor states it can handle.
Have you tried using modetest to see what refresh rates are available?
When I was doing this driver work, I would use modetest to determine
the connector ID, then use modetest -s
<connector-id>:<resolution>-<refresh> to display various resolutions
and refresh rates.
The 8MP shares the video-pll clock with both disp1 and disp2 clocks,
and the imx-lcdif driver, which sends the display signals to the DSI,
uses the disp clock, so the video-pll needs to be an exact multiple of
the pixel clock or the output won't sink. Modetest should also show
you the desired pixel clock for a given resolution and refresh.
My displays didn't show 19200x1200 as an option, so I wasn't able to
test that configuration.
adam
>
> Thanks,
> Rasmus
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list