[PATCH 1/5] drm/panfrost: Stop using drm_gem_shmem_put_pages()

[Boris Brezillon]

On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 19:06:55 +0300
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko at collabora.com> wrote:

> On 6/26/23 18:43, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:20:53 +0300
> > Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko at collabora.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 6/26/23 15:02, Boris Brezillon wrote:  
> >>> -err_pages:
> >>> -	drm_gem_shmem_put_pages(&bo->base);
> >>>  err_unlock:
> >>>  	dma_resv_unlock(obj->resv);
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (ret && pinned)
> >>> +		drm_gem_shmem_unpin(&bo->base);    
> >>
> >> The drm_gem_shmem_unpin() was supposed to be used only in conjunction
> >> with drm_gem_shmem_pin(). I've a pending patch to enable the pin/unpin
> >> refcounting needed by drm-shmem shrinker, it will prohibit invocation of
> >> unpin without a previous pin.
> >>
> >> I'm wondering whether it will be okay to simply remove
> >> drm_gem_shmem_put_pages() from the Panfrost code, letting pages to be
> >> kept allocated in a error case. They will be freed once BO is destroyed.
> >>  
> > 
> > Okay, so after looking at your shmem-shrinker series, I confirm we need
> > to take a pin ref here (hard-pin), otherwise the buffer might be
> > evicted before the GPU is done, especially after you drop gpu_usecount
> > and use only pin_count to check whether a GEM object can be evicted or
> > not.  
> 
> See the drm_gem_evict() [1], it checks whether GEM is busy, preventing
> BO eviction while it is in-use by GPU. Note that in case of Panfrost,
> shrinker isn't enabled for growable BOs.

Okay, we should be good then, sorry for the confusion.