[PATCH 06/13] PM / devfreq: Drop unneed locking to appease lockdep
Rob Clark
robdclark at gmail.com
Sun Mar 12 20:41:34 UTC 2023
From: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org>
In the process of adding lockdep annotation for GPU job_run() path to
catch potential deadlocks against the shrinker/reclaim path, I turned
up this lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #556 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
ring0/123 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffff8087219078 (&devfreq->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffd6f64e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}:
__dma_fence_might_wait+0x74/0xc0
dma_resv_lockdep+0x1f4/0x2f4
do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc
kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c
kernel_init+0x30/0x134
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
-> #2 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}:
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x80/0xa8
slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc
__kmalloc+0xd8/0x100
topology_parse_cpu_capacity+0x8c/0x178
get_cpu_for_node+0x88/0xc4
parse_cluster+0x1b0/0x28c
parse_cluster+0x8c/0x28c
init_cpu_topology+0x168/0x188
smp_prepare_cpus+0x24/0xf8
kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x34c
kernel_init+0x30/0x134
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__fs_reclaim_acquire+0x3c/0x48
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x54/0xa8
slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc
__kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xb8/0xe0
kstrdup+0x70/0x90
kstrdup_const+0x38/0x48
kvasprintf_const+0x48/0xbc
kobject_set_name_vargs+0x40/0xb0
dev_set_name+0x64/0x8c
devfreq_add_device+0x31c/0x55c
devm_devfreq_add_device+0x6c/0xb8
msm_devfreq_init+0xa8/0x16c
msm_gpu_init+0x38c/0x570
adreno_gpu_init+0x1b4/0x2b4
a6xx_gpu_init+0x15c/0x3e4
adreno_bind+0x218/0x254
component_bind_all+0x114/0x1ec
msm_drm_bind+0x2b8/0x608
try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x88/0x1a4
__component_add+0xec/0x13c
component_add+0x1c/0x28
dsi_dev_attach+0x28/0x34
dsi_host_attach+0xdc/0x124
mipi_dsi_attach+0x30/0x44
devm_mipi_dsi_attach+0x2c/0x70
ti_sn_bridge_probe+0x298/0x2c4
auxiliary_bus_probe+0x7c/0x94
really_probe+0x158/0x290
__driver_probe_device+0xc8/0xe0
driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100
__device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc
bus_for_each_drv+0xa0/0xc8
__device_attach+0xd8/0x168
device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
bus_probe_device+0x38/0xa0
deferred_probe_work_func+0xc8/0xe0
process_one_work+0x2d8/0x478
process_scheduled_works+0x4c/0x50
worker_thread+0x218/0x274
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
-> #0 (&devfreq->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060
lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8
__mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0
devfreq_simple_ondemand_handler+0x54/0x7c
devfreq_resume_device+0xa4/0xe8
msm_devfreq_resume+0x78/0xa8
a6xx_pm_resume+0x110/0x234
adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38
pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44
__rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174
rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c
rpm_resume+0x318/0x524
__pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc
pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20
msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178
msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&devfreq->lock --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(dma_fence_map);
lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start);
lock(dma_fence_map);
lock(&devfreq->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by ring0/123:
#0: ffffff8087201170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x64/0x150
#1: ffffffd6f64e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150
stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 123 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #556
Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1 - 2) with LTE (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace.part.0+0xb4/0xf8
show_stack+0x20/0x38
dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd0
dump_stack+0x18/0x34
print_circular_bug+0x1b4/0x1f0
check_noncircular+0x78/0xac
__lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060
lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8
__mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0
devfreq_simple_ondemand_handler+0x54/0x7c
devfreq_resume_device+0xa4/0xe8
msm_devfreq_resume+0x78/0xa8
a6xx_pm_resume+0x110/0x234
adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38
pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44
__rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174
rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c
rpm_resume+0x318/0x524
__pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc
pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20
msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178
msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
The issue is that we cannot be holding any lock while doing memory
allocations that is also needed in the job_run (and in the case of
devfreq, this means runpm_resume()) because lockdep sees this as a
potential dependency.
Fortunately there is really no reason to hold the devfreq lock when
we are creating the devfreq device, as it is not yet visible to any
other task. The only reason it was needed was for a lockdep assert
in devfreq_get_freq_range(). Instead, split this up into an internal
fxn that is used in the devfreq_add_device() (where the lock is not
required).
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at chromium.org>
---
drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index 817c71da391a..11b774048bd2 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -111,23 +111,13 @@ static unsigned long find_available_max_freq(struct devfreq *devfreq)
return max_freq;
}
-/**
- * devfreq_get_freq_range() - Get the current freq range
- * @devfreq: the devfreq instance
- * @min_freq: the min frequency
- * @max_freq: the max frequency
- *
- * This takes into consideration all constraints.
- */
-void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
- unsigned long *min_freq,
- unsigned long *max_freq)
+static void __get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
+ unsigned long *min_freq,
+ unsigned long *max_freq)
{
unsigned long *freq_table = devfreq->freq_table;
s32 qos_min_freq, qos_max_freq;
- lockdep_assert_held(&devfreq->lock);
-
/*
* Initialize minimum/maximum frequency from freq table.
* The devfreq drivers can initialize this in either ascending or
@@ -158,6 +148,23 @@ void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
if (*min_freq > *max_freq)
*min_freq = *max_freq;
}
+
+/**
+ * devfreq_get_freq_range() - Get the current freq range
+ * @devfreq: the devfreq instance
+ * @min_freq: the min frequency
+ * @max_freq: the max frequency
+ *
+ * This takes into consideration all constraints.
+ */
+void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
+ unsigned long *min_freq,
+ unsigned long *max_freq)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&devfreq->lock);
+
+ __get_freq_range(devfreq, min_freq, max_freq);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_get_freq_range);
/**
@@ -810,7 +817,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
}
mutex_init(&devfreq->lock);
- mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
devfreq->dev.parent = dev;
devfreq->dev.class = devfreq_class;
devfreq->dev.release = devfreq_dev_release;
@@ -823,17 +829,14 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
if (devfreq->profile->timer < 0
|| devfreq->profile->timer >= DEVFREQ_TIMER_NUM) {
- mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
err = -EINVAL;
goto err_dev;
}
if (!devfreq->profile->max_state || !devfreq->profile->freq_table) {
- mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
err = set_freq_table(devfreq);
if (err < 0)
goto err_dev;
- mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
} else {
devfreq->freq_table = devfreq->profile->freq_table;
devfreq->max_state = devfreq->profile->max_state;
@@ -841,19 +844,17 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
devfreq->scaling_min_freq = find_available_min_freq(devfreq);
if (!devfreq->scaling_min_freq) {
- mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
err = -EINVAL;
goto err_dev;
}
devfreq->scaling_max_freq = find_available_max_freq(devfreq);
if (!devfreq->scaling_max_freq) {
- mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
err = -EINVAL;
goto err_dev;
}
- devfreq_get_freq_range(devfreq, &min_freq, &max_freq);
+ __get_freq_range(devfreq, &min_freq, &max_freq);
devfreq->suspend_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq(dev);
devfreq->opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
@@ -865,7 +866,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "%s", dev_name(dev));
err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
if (err) {
- mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
put_device(&devfreq->dev);
goto err_out;
}
@@ -876,7 +876,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
devfreq->max_state),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!devfreq->stats.trans_table) {
- mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_devfreq;
}
@@ -886,7 +885,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
sizeof(*devfreq->stats.time_in_state),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!devfreq->stats.time_in_state) {
- mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_devfreq;
}
@@ -896,8 +894,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
srcu_init_notifier_head(&devfreq->transition_notifier_list);
- mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
-
err = dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, &devfreq->user_min_freq_req,
DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0);
if (err < 0)
--
2.39.2
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list