[PATCH v4 2/8] kunit: drm/tests: move generic helpers

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2023-03-20 22:45:52)
> Morning Stephen,
> 
> On 3/20/23 21:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2023-03-18 23:36:20)
> >>>
> >>> I think you would have an easier time if you just copied and renamed
> >>> them into the kunit folder as an preparation series.
> >>
> >> Yes. That would simplify the syncing between the trees. It slightly bugs
> >> me to add dublicate code in kernel-but the clean-up series for DRM users
> >> could be prepared at the same time. It would be even possible to just
> >> change the drm-helper to be a wrapper for the generic one - and leave
> >> the callers intact - although it leaves some seemingly unnecessary
> >> "onion code" there.
> >>
> >>> That way, you wouldn't have to coordinate DRM, CCF and IIO, you'd just
> >>> create new helpers that can be reused/converted to by everyone eventually
> >>
> >> Yes. Thanks - I think I may go with this approach for the v5 :)
> > 
> > Which kunit directory?
> 
> I was thinking of adding the platform_device.h (I liked your suggestion) 
> in the include/kunit/

Ok, thanks for clarifying.

> 
> > I imagine if there are conflicts they will be
> > trivial so it probably doesn't matter.
> 
> Probably so. Still, I am not the one who needs to deal with the 
> conflicts. Hence I like at least asking if people see good way to avoid 
> them in the first place.

Same for me. I'm not the maintainer of the drivers/base directory.

> 
> Besides, I was not sure if you were planning to add similar helper or 
> just wrappers to individual functions. Wanted to ping you just in case 
> this has some impact to what you do.

I don't have a need to bind a device to a driver to satisfy devm APIs
currently. I could probably use it though to test some devm code in the
clk APIs. The only impact is that we're modifying the same files.

> 
> > Have you Cced kunit folks and the
> > list on the kunit patches? They may have some opinion.
> 
> This patch was should have contained the 
> include/kunit/platform_device.h. That file was pulling the Kunit people 
> in recipients but I messed up things with last minute changes so both 
> the header and people were dropped. I'll fix this for v5.
> 

Ok, I'll be on the lookout for v5. From what I can tell kunit goes
through the kernel selftest tree and there isn't a kunit git tree as
such.