[PATCH v2 00/65] clk: Make determine_rate mandatory for muxes

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Maxime Ripard (2023-03-22 03:01:53)
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:55:03PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-11-04 06:17:17)
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This is a follow-up to a previous series that was printing a warning
> > > when a mux has a set_parent implementation but is missing
> > > determine_rate().
> > > 
> > > The rationale is that set_parent() is very likely to be useful when
> > > changing the rate, but it's determine_rate() that takes the parenting
> > > decision. If we're missing it, then the current parent is always going
> > > to be used, and thus set_parent() will not be used. The only exception
> > > being a direct call to clk_set_parent(), but those are fairly rare
> > > compared to clk_set_rate().
> > > 
> > > Stephen then asked to promote the warning to an error, and to fix up all
> > > the muxes that are in that situation first. So here it is :)
> > > 
> > > Let me know what you think,
> > 
> > What's the plan here? Are you going to resend?
> 
> It wasn't clear to me whether or not this was something that you wanted,
> and I got some pushback on the drivers so I kind of forgot about it.
> 
> If you do want it (and it looks like you do), I'll resend it.

Let me read the whole series first. I was ignoring it because I was
assuming it was going to be resent.