[PATCH] drm/msm/dsi: simplify pixel clk rate handling
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Tue Mar 28 13:04:18 UTC 2023
On 26/01/2023 02:07, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On 1/18/2023 5:00 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> Move a call to dsi_calc_pclk() out of calc_clk_rate directly towards
>> msm_dsi_host_get_phy_clk_req(). It is called for both 6g and v2 hosts.
>>
>> Also, while we are at it, replace another dsi_get_pclk_rate() invocation
>> with using the stored value at msm_host->pixel_clk_rate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> index bd3763a5d723..93ec54478eb6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
>> @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ int dsi_dma_base_get_6g(struct msm_dsi_host
>> *msm_host, uint64_t *iova);
>> int dsi_dma_base_get_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, uint64_t *iova);
>> int dsi_clk_init_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>> int dsi_clk_init_6g_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>> -int dsi_calc_clk_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool
>> is_bonded_dsi);
>> -int dsi_calc_clk_rate_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool
>> is_bonded_dsi);
>> +int dsi_calc_clk_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>> +int dsi_calc_clk_rate_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>> void msm_dsi_host_snapshot(struct msm_disp_state *disp_state, struct
>> mipi_dsi_host *host);
>> void msm_dsi_host_test_pattern_en(struct mipi_dsi_host *host);
>> struct drm_dsc_config *msm_dsi_host_get_dsc_config(struct
>> mipi_dsi_host *host);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h
>> index 44be4a88aa83..5106e66846c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.h
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct msm_dsi_host_cfg_ops {
>> void* (*tx_buf_get)(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>> void (*tx_buf_put)(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>> int (*dma_base_get)(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, uint64_t *iova);
>> - int (*calc_clk_rate)(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool
>> is_bonded_dsi);
>> + int (*calc_clk_rate)(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
>> };
>> struct msm_dsi_cfg_handler {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> index 18fa30e1e858..7d99a108bff6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
>> @@ -616,28 +616,21 @@ static void dsi_calc_pclk(struct msm_dsi_host
>> *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi)
>> }
>> -int dsi_calc_clk_rate_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool
>> is_bonded_dsi)
>> +int dsi_calc_clk_rate_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host)
>> {
>> - if (!msm_host->mode) {
>> - pr_err("%s: mode not set\n", __func__);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> - dsi_calc_pclk(msm_host, is_bonded_dsi);
>> msm_host->esc_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(msm_host->esc_clk);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -int dsi_calc_clk_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool
>> is_bonded_dsi)
>> +int dsi_calc_clk_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host)
>> {
>> u32 bpp = dsi_get_bpp(msm_host->format);
>> u64 pclk_bpp;
>> unsigned int esc_mhz, esc_div;
>> unsigned long byte_mhz;
>> - dsi_calc_pclk(msm_host, is_bonded_dsi);
>> -
>> - pclk_bpp = (u64)dsi_get_pclk_rate(msm_host->mode, is_bonded_dsi)
>> * bpp;
>> + pclk_bpp = msm_host->pixel_clk_rate * bpp;
>> do_div(pclk_bpp, 8);
>> msm_host->src_clk_rate = pclk_bpp;
>> @@ -2292,7 +2285,14 @@ void msm_dsi_host_get_phy_clk_req(struct
>> mipi_dsi_host *host,
>> const struct msm_dsi_cfg_handler *cfg_hnd = msm_host->cfg_hnd;
>> int ret;
>> - ret = cfg_hnd->ops->calc_clk_rate(msm_host, is_bonded_dsi);
>> + if (!msm_host->mode) {
>> + pr_err("%s: mode not set\n", __func__);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dsi_calc_pclk(msm_host, is_bonded_dsi);
>> +
>> + ret = cfg_hnd->ops->calc_clk_rate(msm_host);
>
> I am not too sure what we are gaining by this.
>
> Its not that we are replacing dsi_get_pclk_rate().
>
> We are moving the dsi_get_pclk_rate() from the calc_clk_rate() to the
> msm_dsi_host_get_phy_clk_req().
>
> Also, with this change, dsi_calc_clk_rate_6g() looks kind of empty to
> stand on its own.
>
> The original intention of the calc_clk_rate() op seems to be calculate
> and store all the clocks (byte, pixel and esc).
>
> Why change that behavior by breaking it up?
Unification between platforms. Both v2 and 6g platforms call
dsi_calc_pclk(). Let's just move it to a common code path.
>
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("%s: unable to calc clk rate, %d\n", __func__, ret);
>> return;
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list