[PATCH 4/7] drm/msm/dpu: drop duplicated intf/wb indices from encoder structs

[Abhinav Kumar]

On 5/2/2023 4:15 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 02:04, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/30/2023 4:57 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> Remove intf_idx and wb_idx fields from struct dpu_encoder_phys and
>>> struct dpu_enc_phys_init_params. Set the hw_intf and hw_wb directly and
>>> use them to get the instance index.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>
>>   From whatever I can see, this will not affect functionality of intf or
>> wb and cleans it up well , so I am fine with this. Hence,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com>
>>
>> One minor comment/question.
>>
>> <snipped other parts>
>>
>>> @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ struct dpu_encoder_phys *dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_init(
>>>        struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd *cmd_enc = NULL;
>>>        int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> -     DPU_DEBUG("intf %d\n", p->intf_idx - INTF_0);
>>
>> Was it intentional to drop the index in this log?
> 
> We don't have p->intf_idx at this point. I think we can use
> p->hw_intf->idx instead, I'll fix that for v2.
> 

Yes, I was aware that. In all other logs, intf_idx was replaced with 
hw_intf->idx except this one. So I was not sure if it was intentional or 
just removed accidentally.

>>
>>> +     DPU_DEBUG("intf\n");
>>>
>>>        cmd_enc = kzalloc(sizeof(*cmd_enc), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> 
>