[PATCH 5/7] drm/msm/dpu: inline dpu_encoder_get_wb()

Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Tue May 2 23:51:26 UTC 2023



On 4/30/2023 4:57 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The function dpu_encoder_get_wb() returns controller_id if the
> corresponding WB is present in the catalog. We can inline this function
> and rely on dpu_rm_get_wb() returning NULL for indices for which the
> WB is not present on the device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 24 ++-------------------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> index 4c85cbb030e4..507ff3f88c67 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> @@ -1277,22 +1277,6 @@ static enum dpu_intf dpu_encoder_get_intf(const struct dpu_mdss_cfg *catalog,
>   	return INTF_MAX;
>   }
>   
> -static enum dpu_wb dpu_encoder_get_wb(const struct dpu_mdss_cfg *catalog,
> -		enum dpu_intf_type type, u32 controller_id)
> -{
> -	int i = 0;
> -
> -	if (type != INTF_WB)
> -		return WB_MAX;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < catalog->wb_count; i++) {
> -		if (catalog->wb[i].id == controller_id)
> -			return catalog->wb[i].id;
> -	}
> -
> -	return WB_MAX;
> -}
> -
>   void dpu_encoder_vblank_callback(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc,
>   		struct dpu_encoder_phys *phy_enc)
>   {
> @@ -2261,7 +2245,6 @@ static int dpu_encoder_setup_display(struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc,
>   		 */
>   		u32 controller_id = disp_info->h_tile_instance[i];
>   		enum dpu_intf intf_idx;
> -		enum dpu_wb wb_idx;
>   
>   		if (disp_info->num_of_h_tiles > 1) {
>   			if (i == 0)
> @@ -2279,14 +2262,11 @@ static int dpu_encoder_setup_display(struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc,
>   							    disp_info->intf_type,
>   							    controller_id);
>   
> -		wb_idx = dpu_encoder_get_wb(dpu_kms->catalog,
> -				disp_info->intf_type, controller_id);
> -
>   		if (intf_idx >= INTF_0 && intf_idx < INTF_MAX)
>   			phys_params.hw_intf = dpu_rm_get_intf(&dpu_kms->rm, intf_idx);
>   
> -		if (wb_idx >= WB_0 && wb_idx < WB_MAX)
> -			phys_params.hw_wb = dpu_rm_get_wb(&dpu_kms->rm, wb_idx);
> +		if (disp_info->intf_type == INTF_WB && controller_id < WB_MAX)
> +			phys_params.hw_wb = dpu_rm_get_wb(&dpu_kms->rm, controller_id);


 From what I see, with 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/534776/?series=117146&rev=1 we 
are dropping those checks from the RM too, so we are going to rely 
totally on entering the values correctly in catalog from now on?

>   
>   		if (!phys_params.hw_intf && !phys_params.hw_wb) {
>   			DPU_ERROR_ENC(dpu_enc, "no intf or wb block assigned at idx: %d\n", i);


More information about the dri-devel mailing list