[PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/mst: Remove broken MST DSC support
Lisovskiy, Stanislav
stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com
Wed May 3 07:36:42 UTC 2023
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 05:38:57PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> The MST DSC code has a myriad of issues:
> - Platform checks are wrong (MST+DSC is TGL+ only IIRC)
> - Return values of .mode_valid_ctx() are wrong
> - .mode_valid_ctx() assumes bigjoiner might be used, but ther rest
> of the code doesn't agree
> - compressed bpp calculations don't make sense
> - FEC handling needs to consider the entire link as opposed to just
> the single stream. Currently FEC would only get enabled if the
> first enabled stream is compressed. Also I'm not seeing anything
> that would account for the FEC overhead in any bandwidth calculations
> - PPS SDP is only handled for the first stream via the dig_port
> hooks, other streams will not be transmittitng any PPS SDPs
> - PPS SDP readout is missing (also missing for SST!)
> - VDSC readout is missing (also missing for SST!)
>
> The FEC issues is really the big one since we have no way currently
> to apply such link wide configuration constraints. Changing that is
> going to require a much bigger rework of the higher level modeset
> .compute_config() logic. We will also need such a rework to properly
> distribute the available bandwidth across all the streams on the
> same link (which is a must to eg. enable deep color).
Also all the things you mentioned are subject for discussion, for example
I see that FEC overhead is actually accounted for bpp calculation for instance.
We usually improve things by gradually fixing, because if we act same way towards
all wrong code in the driver, we could end up removing the whole i915.
So from my side I would nack it, at least until you have a code which handles
all of this better - I have no doubt you probably have some ideas in your mind, so lets be constructive at least and propose something better first.
This code doesn't cause any regressions, but still provides "some" support to DP MST DSC to say the least and even if that would be removed, if some of those users
refer to me, I would probably then just point to this mail discussion everytime.
Stan
>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai at intel.com>
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> Fixes: d51f25eb479a ("drm/i915: Add DSC support to MST path")
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 176 +-------------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 44c15d6faac4..d762f37fafb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> int min_bpp,
> struct link_config_limits *limits,
> struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> - int step,
> - bool dsc)
> + int step)
> {
> struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->uapi.state;
> struct intel_dp_mst_encoder *intel_mst = enc_to_mst(encoder);
> @@ -104,7 +103,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> for (bpp = max_bpp; bpp >= min_bpp; bpp -= step) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Trying bpp %d\n", bpp);
>
> - ret = intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(i915, bpp, adjusted_mode, crtc_state, dsc);
> + ret = intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(i915, bpp, adjusted_mode, crtc_state, false);
> if (ret)
> continue;
>
> @@ -136,11 +135,8 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "failed finding vcpi slots:%d\n",
> slots);
> } else {
> - if (!dsc)
> - crtc_state->pipe_bpp = bpp;
> - else
> - crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp = bpp;
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Got %d slots for pipe bpp %d dsc %d\n", slots, bpp, dsc);
> + crtc_state->pipe_bpp = bpp;
> + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Got %d slots for pipe bpp %d\n", slots, bpp);
> }
>
> return slots;
> @@ -157,7 +153,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>
> slots = intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(encoder, crtc_state, limits->max_bpp,
> limits->min_bpp, limits,
> - conn_state, 2 * 3, false);
> + conn_state, 2 * 3);
>
> if (slots < 0)
> return slots;
> @@ -173,99 +169,6 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int intel_dp_dsc_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> - struct link_config_limits *limits)
> -{
> - struct intel_dp_mst_encoder *intel_mst = enc_to_mst(encoder);
> - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_mst->primary->dp;
> - struct intel_connector *connector =
> - to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> - const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> - &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> - int slots = -EINVAL;
> - int i, num_bpc;
> - u8 dsc_bpc[3] = {0};
> - int min_bpp, max_bpp, sink_min_bpp, sink_max_bpp;
> - u8 dsc_max_bpc;
> - bool need_timeslot_recalc = false;
> - u32 last_compressed_bpp;
> -
> - /* Max DSC Input BPC for ICL is 10 and for TGL+ is 12 */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
> - dsc_max_bpc = min_t(u8, 12, conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> - else
> - dsc_max_bpc = min_t(u8, 10, conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> -
> - max_bpp = min_t(u8, dsc_max_bpc * 3, limits->max_bpp);
> - min_bpp = limits->min_bpp;
> -
> - num_bpc = drm_dp_dsc_sink_supported_input_bpcs(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd,
> - dsc_bpc);
> -
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DSC Source supported min bpp %d max bpp %d\n",
> - min_bpp, max_bpp);
> -
> - sink_max_bpp = dsc_bpc[0] * 3;
> - sink_min_bpp = sink_max_bpp;
> -
> - for (i = 1; i < num_bpc; i++) {
> - if (sink_min_bpp > dsc_bpc[i] * 3)
> - sink_min_bpp = dsc_bpc[i] * 3;
> - if (sink_max_bpp < dsc_bpc[i] * 3)
> - sink_max_bpp = dsc_bpc[i] * 3;
> - }
> -
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DSC Sink supported min bpp %d max bpp %d\n",
> - sink_min_bpp, sink_max_bpp);
> -
> - if (min_bpp < sink_min_bpp)
> - min_bpp = sink_min_bpp;
> -
> - if (max_bpp > sink_max_bpp)
> - max_bpp = sink_max_bpp;
> -
> - slots = intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(encoder, crtc_state, max_bpp,
> - min_bpp, limits,
> - conn_state, 2 * 3, true);
> -
> - if (slots < 0)
> - return slots;
> -
> - last_compressed_bpp = crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp;
> -
> - crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_nearest_valid_bpp(i915,
> - last_compressed_bpp,
> - crtc_state->pipe_bpp);
> -
> - if (crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp != last_compressed_bpp)
> - need_timeslot_recalc = true;
> -
> - /*
> - * Apparently some MST hubs dislike if vcpi slots are not matching precisely
> - * the actual compressed bpp we use.
> - */
> - if (need_timeslot_recalc) {
> - slots = intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(encoder, crtc_state,
> - crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> - crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> - limits, conn_state, 2 * 3, true);
> - if (slots < 0)
> - return slots;
> - }
> -
> - intel_link_compute_m_n(crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> - crtc_state->lane_count,
> - adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> - crtc_state->port_clock,
> - &crtc_state->dp_m_n,
> - crtc_state->fec_enable);
> - crtc_state->dp_m_n.tu = slots;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> static int intel_dp_mst_update_slots(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
> @@ -349,29 +252,6 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>
> ret = intel_dp_mst_compute_link_config(encoder, pipe_config,
> conn_state, &limits);
> -
> - if (ret == -EDEADLK)
> - return ret;
> -
> - /* enable compression if the mode doesn't fit available BW */
> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Force DSC en = %d\n", intel_dp->force_dsc_en);
> - if (ret || intel_dp->force_dsc_en) {
> - /*
> - * Try to get at least some timeslots and then see, if
> - * we can fit there with DSC.
> - */
> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Trying to find VCPI slots in DSC mode\n");
> -
> - ret = intel_dp_dsc_mst_compute_link_config(encoder, pipe_config,
> - conn_state, &limits);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config,
> - conn_state, &limits,
> - pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu, false);
> - }
> -
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -909,10 +789,6 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
> int max_dotclk = to_i915(connector->dev)->max_dotclk_freq;
> int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock;
> int ret;
> - bool dsc = false, bigjoiner = false;
> - u16 dsc_max_output_bpp = 0;
> - u8 dsc_slice_count = 0;
> - int target_clock = mode->clock;
>
> if (drm_connector_is_unregistered(connector)) {
> *status = MODE_ERROR;
> @@ -950,48 +826,6 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (intel_dp_need_bigjoiner(intel_dp, mode->hdisplay, target_clock)) {
> - bigjoiner = true;
> - max_dotclk *= 2;
> - }
> -
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 10 &&
> - drm_dp_sink_supports_dsc(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd)) {
> - /*
> - * TBD pass the connector BPC,
> - * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
> - */
> - int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(intel_dp, U8_MAX);
> -
> - if (drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(intel_dp->fec_capable)) {
> - dsc_max_output_bpp =
> - intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(dev_priv,
> - max_link_clock,
> - max_lanes,
> - target_clock,
> - mode->hdisplay,
> - bigjoiner,
> - pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
> - dsc_slice_count =
> - intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> - target_clock,
> - mode->hdisplay,
> - bigjoiner);
> - }
> -
> - dsc = dsc_max_output_bpp && dsc_slice_count;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Big joiner configuration needs DSC for TGL which is not true for
> - * XE_LPD where uncompressed joiner is supported.
> - */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 13 && bigjoiner && !dsc)
> - return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> -
> - if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc)
> - return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> -
> *status = intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(dev_priv, mode, false);
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list