[PATCH v6 06/15] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support
Konrad Dybcio
konrad.dybcio at linaro.org
Tue May 9 08:46:07 UTC 2023
On 8.05.2023 23:15, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 10:59:24AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6.05.2023 16:46, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:35:18PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5.05.2023 10:46, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 08:34:07AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3.05.2023 22:32, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 11:40:26AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2.05.2023 09:49, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 01:54:43PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs
>>>>>>>>>> but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that
>>>>>>>>>> the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care
>>>>>>>>>> of enabling & scaling power rails, clocks and bandwidth ourselves.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Reuse existing Adreno-common code and modify the deeply-GMU-infused
>>>>>>>>>> A6XX code to facilitate these GPUs. This involves if-ing out lots
>>>>>>>>>> of GMU callbacks and introducing a new type of GMU - GMU wrapper (it's
>>>>>>>>>> the actual name that Qualcomm uses in their downstream kernels).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is essentially a register region which is convenient to model
>>>>>>>>>> as a device. We'll use it for managing the GDSCs. The register
>>>>>>>>>> layout matches the actual GMU_CX/GX regions on the "real GMU" devices
>>>>>>>>>> and lets us reuse quite a bit of gmu_read/write/rmw calls.
>>>>>>>>> << I sent a reply to this patch earlier, but not sure where it went.
>>>>>>>>> Still figuring out Mutt... >>
>>>>>>>> Answered it here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/4d3000c1-c3f9-0bfd-3eb3-23393f9a8f77@linaro.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks. Will check and respond there if needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't think I see any new comments in this "reply revision" (heh), so please
>>>>>>>> check that one out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Only convenience I found is that we can reuse gmu register ops in a few
>>>>>>>>> places (< 10 I think). If we just model this as another gpu memory
>>>>>>>>> region, I think it will help to keep gmu vs gmu-wrapper/no-gmu
>>>>>>>>> architecture code with clean separation. Also, it looks like we need to
>>>>>>>>> keep a dummy gmu platform device in the devicetree with the current
>>>>>>>>> approach. That doesn't sound right.
>>>>>>>> That's correct, but.. if we switch away from that, VDD_GX/VDD_CX will
>>>>>>>> need additional, gmuwrapper-configuration specific code anyway, as
>>>>>>>> OPP & genpd will no longer make use of the default behavior which
>>>>>>>> only gets triggered if there's a single power-domains=<> entry, afaicu.
>>>>>>> Can you please tell me which specific *default behviour* do you mean here?
>>>>>>> I am curious to know what I am overlooking here. We can always get a cxpd/gxpd device
>>>>>>> and vote for the gdscs directly from the driver. Anything related to
>>>>>>> OPP?
>>>>>> I *believe* this is true:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (ARRAY_SIZE(power-domains) == 1) {
>>>>>> of generic code will enable the power domain at .probe time
>>>>> we need to handle the voting directly. I recently shared a patch to
>>>>> vote cx gdsc from gpu driver. Maybe we can ignore this when gpu has
>>>>> only cx rail due to this logic you quoted here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that you have handled it mostly correctly from the gpu driver in the updated
>>>>> a6xx_pm_suspend() callback. Just the power domain device ptrs should be moved to
>>>>> gpu from gmu.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> opp APIs will default to scaling that domain with required-opps
>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and we do need to put GX/CX (with an MX parent to match) there, as the
>>>>>> AP is responsible for voting in this configuration
>>>>>
>>>>> We should vote to turn ON gx/cx headswitches through genpd from gpu driver. When you vote for
>>>>> core clk frequency, *clock driver is supposed to scale* all the necessary
>>>>> regulators. At least that is how downstream works. You can refer the downstream
>>>>> gpucc clk driver of these SoCs. I am not sure how much of that can be easily converted to
>>>>> upstream.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, how does having a gmu dt node help in this regard? Feel free to
>>>>> elaborate, I am not very familiar with clk/regulator implementations.
>>>> Okay so I think we have a bit of a confusion here.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, with this patchset we manage things like this:
>>>>
>>>> 1. GPU has a VDD_GX (or equivalent[1]) line passed in power-domains=<>, which
>>>> is then used with OPP APIs to ensure it's being scaled on freq change [2].
>>>> The VDD_lines coming from RPM(h) are described as power domains upstream
>>>> *unlike downstream*, which represents them as regulators with preset voltage
>>>> steps (and perhaps that's what had you confused). What's more is that GDSCs
>>>> are also modeled as genpds instead of regulators, hence they sort of "fight"
>>>> for the spot in power-domains=<> of a given node.
>>>
>>> Thanks for clarifying. I didn't get this part "hence they sort of "fight" for the spot in power-domains".
>>> What spot exactly did you mean here? The spot for PD to be used during scaling?
>>>
>>> It seems like you are hinting that there is some sort of limitation in keeping all the
>>> 3 power domains (cx gdsc, gx gdsc and cx rail) under the gpu node in dt. Please explain
>>> why we can't keep all the 3 power domains under gpu node and call an API
>>> (devm_pm_opp_attach_genpd() ??) to select the power domain which should be scaled?
>> Eh we could, but this adds a lot of boilerplate code:
>>
>> - genpd handling with get/put (I'm no genpd master but devm_pm_opp_attach_genpd
>> sounds rather hacky to me)
>
> Not sure if it is hacky I see similar approach by Venus driver here:
> dt: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi#L3699
> driver: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c#L882
The venus driver is not a very strong argument of proving something is
not hacky in my eyes.. I have some opinions on that one :P
If not hacky per se, it's still very explicit and error-prone. And
we know what happens when one mismanages Adreno's PDs..
>
>> - new r/w/rmw functions would need to be introduced for accessing
>> GMU_CX registers as the reg defines wouldn't match so we'd have
>> to include a new magic offset
> Yeah, this is the ugly part. On the bright side, there are very few register accesses which are
> mostly perfcounter related.
>
>> - all the reused gmu_ callbacks would need to be separated out
>
> More LoC of course, but it would be more readable/maintainable if we can make a clean
> separation with different callbacks btw gmu vs no-gmu.
>
>> - A619_holi would be even more problematic to distinguish from A619,
>> similar story goes for firmware loading requirements
>
> I suppose we can check the presence of gmu to identify holi?
> For eg:, dynamically allocate 'struct a6xx_gmu' within a6xx_gmu_init() and
> then we can null check a6xx_gpu->(*gmu).
>
> For holi's gmu fw loading, moving gmu fw loading to the gmu start sequence might be the
> cleanest approach.
Eeeh.. I'd say the current approach I took is better than this..
Otherwise we'd have to hack around calling fw loader functions from
two places, take care of how they defer/interact with the userland
fw helper, how that plays around with pm ops etc.
>
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. GMU wrapper gets CX_GDSC & GX_GDSC handles in power-domains=<> (just like
>>>> the real GMU in the current state of upstream [3]), which are then governed
>>>> through explicit genpd calls to turn them on/off when the GPU resume/suspend/
>>>> crash recovery functions are called.
>>>>
>>>> 3. GPUs with GMU, like A630, don't get any power-domains=<> entries in DT,
>>>> instead relying on the GMU firmware to communicate necessary requests
>>>> to the VDD_xyz resources directly to RPMh, as part of the DVFS routines.
>>>> If GMU wasn't so smart, we would have to do the exact same VDD_xyz+OPP dance
>>>> there - that's precisely what's going on under the hood.
>>>>
>>>> 4. Adreno SMMU gets a handle to CX_GDSC so that when OF probe funcs are called,
>>>> (and SMMUs probe way way before all things drm) the headswitch is de-asserted
>>>> and its registers and related clocks are accessible.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All this makes me believe the way I generally architected things in
>>>> this series is correct.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] A610 (and I think A612) lack a VDD_GX line, so they power the GPU from
>>>> VDD_CX, but that's just an implementation detail which is handled by
>>>> simply passing the correct one in DTS, the code doesn't care.
>>>>
>>>> [2] Hence my recent changes to use dev_pm_opp_set_rate() wherever possible,
>>>> this func reads requires-opps in OPP table entries and ensures to elevate
>>>> the GENPD's performance state before switching frequencies
>>>>
>>>> [3] Please take a look at the "end product" here:
>>>> https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/commit/fb16757c3bf4c087ac597d70c7a98755d46bb323
>>>> you can open e.g. sdm845.dtsi for comparison with real GMU
>>>
>>> This dt definition for a610 gpu clearly shows the issue I have here. Someone
>>> looking at this gets a very wrong picture about the platform like there is actually nothing
>>> resembling a gmu IP in a610. Is gmu or gmu-cx register region really present in this hw?
>> Yes it is! Take a look at this hunk for example
>>
>> if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>> /* Do it here, as GMU wrapper only inits the GMU for memory reservation etc. */
>>
>> /* Set up the CX GMU counter 0 to count busy ticks */
>> gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_AO_GPU_CX_BUSY_MASK, 0xff000000);
>>
>> /* Enable power counter 0 */
>> gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CX_GMU_POWER_COUNTER_SELECT_0, 0xff, BIT(5));
>> gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CX_GMU_POWER_COUNTER_ENABLE, 1);
>> }
>>
>> they are present, functional and at a predictable offset, just like
>> the real thing! The "only" difference is that there's no GMU_GX, so
>> registers responsible for interfacing with the MCU that lives (well,
>> would live) on the GPU island. For all I know, it may actually even
>> be physically there, just disabled / fused off as there's no RPMh to
>> communicate with.. In fact, I'd suspect that's precisely the case
>> on A619_holi (vs normal A619 which uses a GMU on RPMh-enabled SM6350).
>
> I have to go with your findings. I am just finding it hard to get onboard with
> a dummy node in devicetree to save few loC in the driver. I believe we should
> start with a dt definition that is close to the platform and handle the
> implementation complexity in the driver, not the other way around.
As I mentioned, the definition is not "dummy", there are physical registers
associated with it that we interact with. The only difference is that there
are less of them and the M3 core that would usually tickle that outstanding
part is disabled/removed.
This disagreement seems to come from our (perhaps wrong) assumption that
"GMU" === "cortex M3", whereas the register naming scheme suggests that it's
only a part of a bigger picture.. Here's my attempt at drawing the A6xx:
+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| | |
| <+> |
| | |
| part of GPUCC | GBIF/VBIF | MEMNoC/BIMC
CNoC | RBBM+CP+SQE+... | SPTPRAC/GFXreg +-----------------------
---------------+ | |
| | |
| GPU GX_core | GPU_GX |
| ^ ^ | ^ |
+----------+------------+----+---+-----------------+--+
| v | v | v |
| | | RPMh client |
| part of GPUCC | | PWR mgmt |
| HWCG+LLC intf | CNTRs | M3 |
| <+> | |
CX_GDSC | GPU_CX | GMU_CX | GMU_GX |
-------------> | | |
+-+-------^--------^----+--------+-+-----+------------+
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
v | | | |
GPUSS_PLL RSC AOP mbx
LLCC SW_RES
it's simplified and contains some obvious mistakes but I believe
the "gmu wrapper" parts still contain all that silicon..
Take a look at the clock controller drivers for these platforms
and you'll notice they even have GMU and GX domain clocks!
Hence I'm still trying to convince you the approach in this patch
is correct, or least "correct enough" :D
Associating GMU purely with the MCU may be a legacy of the A5xx
GPMU where your GPU either had it or not, but this is not so binary
on A6xx (and A7xx for that matter) :/
Konrad
P.S
Note to Qualcomm Legal in case you read this: I have no access to
Adreno docs, this is a best-guess visualisation of what I see
based on the register layout that comes from public downstream
kernel sources
>
> -Akhil
>
>>
>> Perhaps I could rename the GMU wrapper's reg-names entry to "gmu_cx" to
>> make things more obvious?
>>
>> Konrad
>>
>>>
>>> Just a side note about the dt file you shared:
>>> 1. At line: 1243, It shouldn't have gx gdsc, right?
>>> 2. At line: 1172, SM6115_VDDCX -> SM6115_VDDGX?
>>>
>>> -Akhil
>> (ignoring as agreed in your replies)
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope this answers your concerns. If not, I'll be happy to elaborate.
>>>>
>>>> Konrad
>>>>>
>>>>> -Akhil.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Konrad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Akhil
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If nothing else, this is a very convenient way to model a part of the
>>>>>>>> GPU (as that's essentially what GMU_CX is, to my understanding) and
>>>>>>>> the bindings people didn't shoot me in the head for proposing this, so
>>>>>>>> I assume it'd be cool to pursue this..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Konrad
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio at linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 72 +++++++-
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 255 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h | 1 +
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c | 14 +-
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 8 +-
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 6 +
>>>>>>>>>> 6 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 87babbb2a19f..b1acdb027205 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1469,6 +1469,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_get_irq(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
>>>>>>>>>> struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>>>>>>>>>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(gmu->dev);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1494,10 +1495,12 @@ void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> gmu->mmio = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>> gmu->rscc = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_gmu_memory_free(gmu);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_gmu_memory_free(gmu);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - free_irq(gmu->gmu_irq, gmu);
>>>>>>>>>> - free_irq(gmu->hfi_irq, gmu);
>>>>>>>>>> + free_irq(gmu->gmu_irq, gmu);
>>>>>>>>>> + free_irq(gmu->hfi_irq, gmu);
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* Drop reference taken in of_find_device_by_node */
>>>>>>>>>> put_device(gmu->dev);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1516,6 +1519,69 @@ static int cxpd_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
>>>>>>>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>>>>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!pdev)
>>>>>>>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true);
>>>>>>>>> why setup dma for a device that is not actually present?
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_enable(gmu->dev);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Mark legacy for manual SPTPRAC control */
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu->legacy = true;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Map the GMU registers */
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu->mmio = a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(pdev, "gmu");
>>>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->mmio)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->mmio);
>>>>>>>>>> + goto err_mmio;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu->cxpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(gmu->dev, "cx");
>>>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->cxpd)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->cxpd);
>>>>>>>>>> + goto err_mmio;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!device_link_add(gmu->dev, gmu->cxpd, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>>>>>>>>>> + goto detach_cxpd;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + init_completion(&gmu->pd_gate);
>>>>>>>>>> + complete_all(&gmu->pd_gate);
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu->pd_nb.notifier_call = cxpd_notifier_cb;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Get a link to the GX power domain to reset the GPU */
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu->gxpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(gmu->dev, "gx");
>>>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(gmu->gxpd)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->gxpd);
>>>>>>>>>> + goto err_mmio;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu->initialized = true;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +detach_cxpd:
>>>>>>>>>> + dev_pm_domain_detach(gmu->cxpd, false);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +err_mmio:
>>>>>>>>>> + iounmap(gmu->mmio);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Drop reference taken in of_find_device_by_node */
>>>>>>>>>> + put_device(gmu->dev);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 931f9f3b3a85..8e0345ffab81 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -20,9 +20,11 @@ static inline bool _a6xx_check_idle(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - /* Check that the GMU is idle */
>>>>>>>>>> - if (!a6xx_gmu_isidle(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>>>>>>>>>> - return false;
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Check that the GMU is idle */
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!a6xx_gmu_isidle(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>>>>>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* Check tha the CX master is idle */
>>>>>>>>>> if (gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_STATUS) &
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -612,13 +614,15 @@ static void a6xx_set_hwcg(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool state)
>>>>>>>>>> return;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* Disable SP clock before programming HWCG registers */
>>>>>>>>>> - gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 1, 0);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 1, 0);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> for (i = 0; (reg = &adreno_gpu->info->hwcg[i], reg->offset); i++)
>>>>>>>>>> gpu_write(gpu, reg->offset, state ? reg->value : 0);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* Enable SP clock */
>>>>>>>>>> - gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, 1);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL, state ? clock_cntl_on : 0);
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1018,10 +1022,13 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>>>>>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - /* Make sure the GMU keeps the GPU on while we set it up */
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_GPU_SET);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Make sure the GMU keeps the GPU on while we set it up */
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_GPU_SET);
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* Clear GBIF halt in case GX domain was not collapsed */
>>>>>>>>>> if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1144,6 +1151,17 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> 0x3f0243f0);
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Do it here, as GMU wrapper only inits the GMU for memory reservation etc. */
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Set up the CX GMU counter 0 to count busy ticks */
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_AO_GPU_CX_BUSY_MASK, 0xff000000);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Enable power counter 0 */
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CX_GMU_POWER_COUNTER_SELECT_0, 0xff, BIT(5));
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CX_GMU_POWER_COUNTER_ENABLE, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> /* Protect registers from the CP */
>>>>>>>>>> a6xx_set_cp_protect(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1233,6 +1251,8 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> out:
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>>>>> * Tell the GMU that we are done touching the GPU and it can start power
>>>>>>>>>> * management
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1267,6 +1287,9 @@ static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> adreno_dump(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +#define GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK BIT(0)
>>>>>>>>>> +#define GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK BIT(0)
>>>>>>>>>> +#define GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK BIT(1)
>>>>>>>>>> #define VBIF_RESET_ACK_TIMEOUT 100
>>>>>>>>>> #define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK 0x00f0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1299,7 +1322,8 @@ static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> * Turn off keep alive that might have been enabled by the hang
>>>>>>>>>> * interrupt
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> - gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 0);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 0);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe it is better to move this to a6xx_gmu_force_power_off.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&gpu->pdev->dev);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1329,6 +1353,32 @@ static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> dev_pm_genpd_remove_notifier(gmu->cxpd);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Software-reset the GPU */
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is not soft reset sequence. We are trying to quiescent gpu - ddr
>>>>>>>>> traffic with this sequence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
>>>>>>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>>>>>>>>>> + spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
>>>>>>>>>> + GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Halt new client requests on GBIF */
>>>>>>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK);
>>>>>>>>>> + spin_until((gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
>>>>>>>>>> + (GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK)) == GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Halt all AXI requests on GBIF */
>>>>>>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK);
>>>>>>>>>> + spin_until((gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
>>>>>>>>>> + (GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK)) == GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Clear the halts */
>>>>>>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* This *really* needs to go through before we do anything else! */
>>>>>>>>>> + mb();
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This sequence should be before we collapse cx gdsc. Also, please see if
>>>>>>>>> we can create a subroutine to avoid code dup.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&gpu->pdev->dev);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> if (active_submits)
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1463,7 +1513,8 @@ static void a6xx_fault_detect_irq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> * Force the GPU to stay on until after we finish
>>>>>>>>>> * collecting information
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> - gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + gmu_write(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_GMU_PWR_COL_KEEPALIVE, 1);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev,
>>>>>>>>>> "gpu fault ring %d fence %x status %8.8X rb %4.4x/%4.4x ib1 %16.16llX/%4.4x ib2 %16.16llX/%4.4x\n",
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1624,7 +1675,7 @@ static void a6xx_llc_slices_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>>>>>>>> a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> +static int a6xx_gmu_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1644,10 +1695,61 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> a6xx_llc_activate(a6xx_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> +static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>>>>>>>>>> + unsigned long freq = 0;
>>>>>>>>>> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>>>>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + gpu->needs_hw_init = true;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>>>>>>> I think we can ignore gmu lock as there is no real gmu device.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->dev);
>>>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gmu->gxpd);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Set the core clock, having VDD scaling in mind */
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&gpu->pdev->dev, gpu->fast_rate);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>>>>>> + goto err_core_clk;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>>>>>> + goto err_bulk_clk;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(gpu->ebi1_clk);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>>>>>> + goto err_mem_clk;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
>>>>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>>> +err_mem_clk:
>>>>>>>>>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
>>>>>>>>>> +err_bulk_clk:
>>>>>>>>>> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(&gpu->pdev->dev, &freq);
>>>>>>>>>> + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
>>>>>>>>>> + dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&gpu->pdev->dev, 0);
>>>>>>>>>> +err_core_clk:
>>>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
>>>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>>>>>>>> + msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +static int a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1674,11 +1776,62 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> + struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
>>>>>>>>>> + unsigned long freq = 0;
>>>>>>>>>> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>>>>>>>>>> + int i, ret;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + trace_msm_gpu_suspend(0);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(&gpu->pdev->dev, &freq);
>>>>>>>>>> + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(gpu->ebi1_clk);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Set frequency to the minimum supported level (no 27MHz on A6xx!) */
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(&gpu->pdev->dev, freq);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>>>>>>> + goto err;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->gxpd);
>>>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->dev);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + if (a6xx_gpu->shadow_bo)
>>>>>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++)
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_gpu->shadow[i] = 0;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + gpu->suspend_count++;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +err:
>>>>>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>>>>>>>> + *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER);
>>>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> Instead of wrapper check here, we can just create a separate op. I don't
>>>>>>>>> see any benefit in reusing the same function here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1716,7 +1869,8 @@ static void a6xx_destroy(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> drm_gem_object_put(a6xx_gpu->shadow_bo);
>>>>>> 6xx_pm_suspend >>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_llc_slices_destroy(a6xx_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_llc_slices_destroy(a6xx_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>>>>>>>>> a6xx_gmu_remove(a6xx_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1957,8 +2111,8 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
>>>>>>>>>> .set_param = adreno_set_param,
>>>>>>>>>> .hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
>>>>>>>>>> .ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
>>>>>>>>>> - .pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
>>>>>>>>>> - .pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
>>>>>>>>>> + .pm_suspend = a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend,
>>>>>>>>>> + .pm_resume = a6xx_gmu_pm_resume,
>>>>>>>>>> .recover = a6xx_recover,
>>>>>>>>>> .submit = a6xx_submit,
>>>>>>>>>> .active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1982,6 +2136,35 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
>>>>>>>>>> .get_timestamp = a6xx_get_timestamp,
>>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs_gmuwrapper = {
>>>>>>>>>> + .base = {
>>>>>>>>>> + .get_param = adreno_get_param,
>>>>>>>>>> + .set_param = adreno_set_param,
>>>>>>>>>> + .hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
>>>>>>>>>> + .ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
>>>>>>>>>> + .pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
>>>>>>>>>> + .pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
>>>>>>>>>> + .recover = a6xx_recover,
>>>>>>>>>> + .submit = a6xx_submit,
>>>>>>>>>> + .active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
>>>>>>>>>> + .irq = a6xx_irq,
>>>>>>>>>> + .destroy = a6xx_destroy,
>>>>>>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>>>>>>>>>> + .show = a6xx_show,
>>>>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>>>>> + .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy,
>>>>>>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>>>>>>>>>> + .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
>>>>>>>>>> + .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
>>>>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>>>>> + .create_address_space = a6xx_create_address_space,
>>>>>>>>>> + .create_private_address_space = a6xx_create_private_address_space,
>>>>>>>>>> + .get_rptr = a6xx_get_rptr,
>>>>>>>>>> + .progress = a6xx_progress,
>>>>>>>>>> + },
>>>>>>>>>> + .get_timestamp = a6xx_get_timestamp,
>>>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2003,18 +2186,36 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> adreno_gpu->registers = NULL;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
>>>>>>>>>> + node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
>>>>>>>>>> + /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
>>>>>>>>>> + BUG_ON(!node);
>>>>>>>>> How will you handle this BUG() when there is no GMU (a610 gpu)?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + adreno_gpu->gmu_is_wrapper = of_device_is_compatible(node, "qcom,adreno-gmu-wrapper");
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>>>>> * We need to know the platform type before calling into adreno_gpu_init
>>>>>>>>>> * so that the hw_apriv flag can be correctly set. Snoop into the info
>>>>>>>>>> * and grab the revision number
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> info = adreno_info(config->rev);
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> - if (info && (info->revn == 650 || info->revn == 660 ||
>>>>>>>>>> - adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 3, 5, ANY_ID), info->rev)))
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!info)
>>>>>>>>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Assign these early so that we can use the is_aXYZ helpers */
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Numeric revision IDs (e.g. 630) */
>>>>>>>>>> + adreno_gpu->revn = info->revn;
>>>>>>>>>> + /* New-style ADRENO_REV()-only */
>>>>>>>>>> + adreno_gpu->rev = info->rev;
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Quirk data */
>>>>>>>>>> + adreno_gpu->info = info;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a660_family(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> adreno_gpu->base.hw_apriv = true;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_llc_slices_init(pdev, a6xx_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>> + /* No LLCC on non-RPMh (and by extension, non-GMU) SoCs */
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_llc_slices_init(pdev, a6xx_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ret = a6xx_set_supported_hw(&pdev->dev, config->rev);
>>>>>>>>>> if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2022,7 +2223,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>>>>>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_gmuwrapper, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>>> a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
>>>>>>>>>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2035,13 +2239,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>>>>>>> if (adreno_is_a618(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_7c3(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> priv->gpu_clamp_to_idle = true;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
>>>>>>>>>> - node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> - /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
>>>>>>>>>> - BUG_ON(!node);
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> - ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>>>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
>>>>>>>>>> of_node_put(node);
>>>>>>>>>> if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>>> a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>>>>>>>>>> index eea2e60ce3b7..51a7656072fa 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
>>>>>>>>>> void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
>>>>>>>>>> +int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
>>>>>>>>>> void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 30ecdff363e7..4e5d650578c6 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1041,16 +1041,18 @@ struct msm_gpu_state *a6xx_gpu_state_get(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> /* Get the generic state from the adreno core */
>>>>>>>>>> adreno_gpu_state_get(gpu, &a6xx_state->base);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>>>>>>>>> nit: Kinda misleading function name to a layman. Should we invert the
>>>>>>>>> function to "adreno_has_gmu"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Akhil
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>>>>>>>>> + a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
>>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* If GX isn't on the rest of the data isn't going to be accessible */
>>>>>>>>>> - if (!a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>>>>>>>>>> + if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && !a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
>>>>>>>>>> return &a6xx_state->base;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /* Get the banks of indexed registers */
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 6934cee07d42..5c5901d65950 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -528,6 +528,10 @@ int adreno_load_fw(struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> if (!adreno_gpu->info->fw[i])
>>>>>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Skip loading GMU firwmare with GMU Wrapper */
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && i == ADRENO_FW_GMU)
>>>>>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> /* Skip if the firmware has already been loaded */
>>>>>>>>>> if (adreno_gpu->fw[i])
>>>>>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1074,8 +1078,8 @@ int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>>>>>>>> u32 speedbin;
>>>>>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use */
>>>>>>>>>> - if (config->rev.core < 6) {
>>>>>>>>>> + /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use (or is absent). */
>>>>>>>>>> + if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || config->rev.core < 6) {
>>>>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>>>>> * This can only be done before devm_pm_opp_of_add_table(), or
>>>>>>>>>> * dev_pm_opp_set_config() will WARN_ON()
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>>>>>>>>> index f62612a5c70f..ee5352bc5329 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct adreno_gpu {
>>>>>>>>>> * code (a3xx_gpu.c) and stored in this common location.
>>>>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>>>>> const unsigned int *reg_offsets;
>>>>>>>>>> + bool gmu_is_wrapper;
>>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>> #define to_adreno_gpu(x) container_of(x, struct adreno_gpu, base)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -145,6 +146,11 @@ struct adreno_platform_config {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> bool adreno_cmp_rev(struct adreno_rev rev1, struct adreno_rev rev2);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +static inline bool adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>> + return gpu->gmu_is_wrapper;
>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> static inline bool adreno_is_a2xx(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> return (gpu->revn < 300);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> 2.40.0
>>>>>>>>>>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list