[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 6/8] drm/i915/uapi/pxp: Add a GET_PARAM for PXP

[Teres Alexis, Alan Previn]

alan:snip

> This is why I asked if it was it was "basically certain that in a
> production environment, then it will eventually return 1 meaning it's
> ready". Alan's response was a little ambiguous on this point.
alan: if we get a '2' and never transition to '1' - thats a kernel bug or
firmware / system issue.

> Arguably a transition from 2 to -ENODEV could be considered a kernel
> bug, but it doesn't sound like Alan would agree. :) Maybe Alan would
> agree to saying it's either a kernel, or system integration bug.
alan: agreed - that would be a kernel bug or a system integration bug.

I also agreed on the init-flow vs app-usage thoughts Jordan had.
That said MESA has many ways it can use this UAPI and we can discuss
that on the MESA patch.


hmmm.. so... ack anyone? [insert big hopeful smiley here]
apologies if I am asking too often.