[PATCH v2] drm/dp_mst: Clear MSG_RDY flag before sending new message
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Tue May 16 10:34:22 UTC 2023
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin at amd.com> wrote:
> [Why]
> The sequence for collecting down_reply from source perspective should
> be:
>
> Request_n->repeat (get partial reply of Request_n->clear message ready
> flag to ack DPRX that the message is received) till all partial
> replies for Request_n are received->new Request_n+1.
>
> Now there is chance that drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq() will fire new down
> request in the tx queue when the down reply is incomplete. Source is
> restricted to generate interveleaved message transactions so we should
> avoid it.
>
> Also, while assembling partial reply packets, reading out DPCD DOWN_REP
> Sideband MSG buffer + clearing DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag should be
> wrapped up as a complete operation for reading out a reply packet.
> Kicking off a new request before clearing DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag might
> be risky. e.g. If the reply of the new request has overwritten the
> DPRX DOWN_REP Sideband MSG buffer before source writing one to clear
> DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY flag, source then unintentionally flushes the reply
> for the new request. Should handle the up request in the same way.
>
> [How]
> Separete drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq() into 2 steps. After acking the MST IRQ
> event, driver calls drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step2() and might trigger
> drm_dp_mst_kick_tx() only when there is no on going message transaction.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Reworked on review comments received
> -> Adjust the fix to let driver explicitly kick off new down request
> when mst irq event is handled and acked
> -> Adjust the commit message
>
> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin at amd.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 8 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 5 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 5 ++-
> include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 4 +--
> 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> index 1ad67c2a697e..48bdcb2ee9b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> @@ -3259,10 +3259,9 @@ static void dm_handle_mst_sideband_msg(struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector)
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("ESI %02x %02x %02x\n", esi[0], esi[1], esi[2]);
> /* handle HPD short pulse irq */
> if (aconnector->mst_mgr.mst_state)
> - drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(
> - &aconnector->mst_mgr,
> - esi,
> - &new_irq_handled);
> + drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step1(&aconnector->mst_mgr,
> + esi,
> + &new_irq_handled);
>
> if (new_irq_handled) {
> /* ACK at DPCD to notify down stream */
> @@ -3281,6 +3280,7 @@ static void dm_handle_mst_sideband_msg(struct amdgpu_dm_connector *aconnector)
> break;
> }
>
> + drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step2(&aconnector->mst_mgr);
> /* check if there is new irq to be handled */
> dret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(
> &aconnector->dm_dp_aux.aux,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 70df29fe92db..2e0a38a6509c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -4045,7 +4045,7 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> }
>
> /**
> - * drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq() - MST hotplug IRQ notify
> + * drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step1() - MST hotplug IRQ notify
> * @mgr: manager to notify irq for.
> * @esi: 4 bytes from SINK_COUNT_ESI
> * @handled: whether the hpd interrupt was consumed or not
> @@ -4055,7 +4055,7 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> * topology manager will process the sideband messages received as a result
> * of this.
> */
> -int drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, u8 *esi, bool *handled)
> +int drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, u8 *esi, bool *handled)
If you're changing the signature of the function, I'd make esi "const u8
*esi", and add a separate "u8 *ack" that you have to provide, where this
function would |= the flags to ack. It would be useful at least in i915.
As to naming, _step1 and _step2 are pretty vague.
> {
> int ret = 0;
> int sc;
> @@ -4077,11 +4077,38 @@ int drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, u8 *esi, bool *handl
> *handled = true;
> }
>
> - drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(mgr);
> return ret;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step1);
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step2() - MST hotplug IRQ 2nd part handling
> + * @mgr: manager to notify irq for.
> + *
> + * This should be called from the driver when mst irq event is handled
> + * and acked. Note that new down request should only be sent when
> + * previous message transaction is done. Source is not supposed to generate
> + * interleaved message transactions.
> + */
> +void drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
_done, _finish, _complete?
> +{
> + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg;
> + bool skip = false;
>
> + mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
> + txmsg = list_first_entry_or_null(&mgr->tx_msg_downq,
> + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx, next);
> + /* If last transaction is not completed yet*/
> + if (!txmsg ||
> + txmsg->state == DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_START_SEND ||
> + txmsg->state == DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_SENT)
> + skip = true;
> + mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> +
> + if (!skip)
Please avoid negatives like this. You could have bool kick = true instead.
> + drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(mgr);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step2);
> /**
> * drm_dp_mst_detect_port() - get connection status for an MST port
> * @connector: DRM connector for this port
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 75070eb07d4b..9a9a5aec9534 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3803,7 +3803,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_hpd_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 *esi, u8 *ack)
> {
> bool handled = false;
>
> - drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, esi, &handled);
> + drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step1(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, esi, &handled);
> if (handled)
> ack[1] |= esi[1] & (DP_DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY | DP_UP_REQ_MSG_RDY);
>
> @@ -3880,6 +3880,9 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> if (!intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, ack))
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Failed to ack ESI\n");
> +
> + if (ack[1] & (DP_DOWN_REP_MSG_RDY | DP_UP_REQ_MSG_RDY))
> + drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step2(&intel_dp->mst_mgr);
I'm getting confused about the division of responsibilities between the
two functions to be called, and the caller. Why does i915 do things
differently from nouveau and amd wrt this?
> }
>
> return link_ok;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> index ed9d374147b8..00c36fcc8afd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> @@ -1332,12 +1332,15 @@ nv50_mstm_service(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
> break;
> }
>
> - drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(&mstm->mgr, esi, &handled);
> + drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step1(&mstm->mgr, esi, &handled);
> if (!handled)
> break;
>
> rc = drm_dp_dpcd_write(aux, DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI + 1, &esi[1],
> 3);
> +
> + drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step2(&mstm->mgr);
> +
Don't you think the return value should be checked first?
> if (rc != 3) {
> ret = false;
> break;
> diff --git a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> index 32c764fb9cb5..6c08ba765d5a 100644
> --- a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> @@ -815,8 +815,8 @@ void drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_destroy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr);
> bool drm_dp_read_mst_cap(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]);
> int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, bool mst_state);
>
> -int drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, u8 *esi, bool *handled);
> -
> +int drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, u8 *esi, bool *handled);
> +void drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq_step2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr);
>
> int
> drm_dp_mst_detect_port(struct drm_connector *connector,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list