[PATCH V6 5/6] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Dynamically configure DPHY timing

Jagan Teki jagan at amarulasolutions.com
Wed May 17 11:27:50 UTC 2023


On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 5:27 AM Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The DPHY timings are currently hard coded. Since the input
> clock can be variable, the phy timings need to be variable
> too.  To facilitate this, we need to cache the hs_clock
> based on what is generated from the PLL.
>
> The phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk function
> configures the DPHY timings in pico-seconds, and a small macro
> converts those timings into clock cycles based on the hs_clk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
> Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst at chromium.org>
> Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>
> Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>
> Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.h     |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> index 08266303c261..3944b7cfbbdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -218,6 +218,8 @@
>
>  #define OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME         "pll_clk"
>
> +#define PS_TO_CYCLE(ps, hz) DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(((ps) * (hz)), 1000000000000ULL)
> +
>  static const char *const clk_names[5] = {
>         "bus_clk",
>         "sclk_mipi",
> @@ -651,6 +653,8 @@ static unsigned long samsung_dsim_set_pll(struct samsung_dsim *dsi,
>                 reg = samsung_dsim_read(dsi, DSIM_STATUS_REG);
>         } while ((reg & DSIM_PLL_STABLE) == 0);
>
> +       dsi->hs_clock = fout;
> +
>         return fout;
>  }
>
> @@ -698,13 +702,46 @@ static void samsung_dsim_set_phy_ctrl(struct samsung_dsim *dsi)
>         const struct samsung_dsim_driver_data *driver_data = dsi->driver_data;
>         const unsigned int *reg_values = driver_data->reg_values;
>         u32 reg;
> +       struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy cfg;
> +       int clk_prepare, lpx, clk_zero, clk_post, clk_trail;
> +       int hs_exit, hs_prepare, hs_zero, hs_trail;
> +       unsigned long long byte_clock = dsi->hs_clock / 8;
>
>         if (driver_data->has_freqband)
>                 return;
>
> +       phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk(dsi->hs_clock,
> +                                                  dsi->lanes, &cfg);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * TODO:
> +        * The tech reference manual for i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus

Does it mean, Applications Processor Reference Manual? better add it
clear reference.

> +        * doesn't state what the definition of the PHYTIMING
> +        * bits are beyond their address and bit position.
> +        * After reviewing NXP's downstream code, it appears
> +        * that the various PHYTIMING registers take the number
> +        * of cycles and use various dividers on them.  This
> +        * calculation does not result in an exact match to the
> +        * downstream code, but it is very close, and it appears
> +        * to sync at a variety of resolutions. If someone
> +        * can get a more accurate mathematical equation needed
> +        * for these registers, this should be updated.
> +        */
> +
> +       lpx = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.lpx, byte_clock);
> +       hs_exit = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.hs_exit, byte_clock);
> +       clk_prepare = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.clk_prepare, byte_clock);
> +       clk_zero = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.clk_zero, byte_clock);
> +       clk_post = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.clk_post, byte_clock);
> +       clk_trail = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.clk_trail, byte_clock);
> +       hs_prepare = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.hs_prepare, byte_clock);
> +       hs_zero = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.hs_zero, byte_clock);
> +       hs_trail = PS_TO_CYCLE(cfg.hs_trail, byte_clock);

I think we can do some kind of negotiation has done similar in bsp by
taking inputs from bit_clk  and PLL_1432X table. Did you try this? we
thought this approach while writing dsim to support dynamic dphy.

Thanks,
Jagan.


More information about the dri-devel mailing list