[PATCH v3 06/12] drm/msm/dpu: Add SM6350 support
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Thu May 18 21:21:52 UTC 2023
On 19/05/2023 00:06, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-05-05 23:40:32, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Add SM6350 support to the DPU1 driver to enable display output.
>>
>> It's worth noting that one entry dpu_qos_lut_entry was trimmed off:
>>
>> {.fl = 0, .lut = 0x0011223344556677 },
>
> Is this macrotile-qseed? Not really following where this is supposed to
> sit.
Yes, it is a qseed entry. We do not support this (yet).
>
>>
>> due to the fact that newer SoCs dropped the .fl (fill level)-based
>> logic and don't provide real values, resulting in all entries but
>> the last one being unused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio at somainline.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten at somainline.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_4_sm6350.h | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 5 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 3 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_4_sm6350.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_4_sm6350.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..e8bfbd468e0a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_4_sm6350.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2022. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, 2020 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Linaro Limited
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _DPU_6_4_SM6350_H
>> +#define _DPU_6_4_SM6350_H
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_caps sm6350_dpu_caps = {
>> + .max_mixer_width = DEFAULT_DPU_OUTPUT_LINE_WIDTH,
>> + .max_mixer_blendstages = 0x7,
>> + .qseed_type = DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4,
>> + .has_src_split = true,
>> + .has_dim_layer = true,
>> + .has_idle_pc = true,
>> + .max_linewidth = DEFAULT_DPU_OUTPUT_LINE_WIDTH,
>> + .pixel_ram_size = DEFAULT_PIXEL_RAM_SIZE,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_ubwc_cfg sm6350_ubwc_cfg = {
>> + .ubwc_version = DPU_HW_UBWC_VER_20,
>> + .ubwc_swizzle = 6,
>> + .highest_bank_bit = 1,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_mdp_cfg sm6350_mdp[] = {
>> + {
>> + .name = "top_0", .id = MDP_TOP,
>> + .base = 0x0, .len = 0x494,
>> + .features = 0,
>> + .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0] = { .reg_off = 0x2ac, .bit_off = 0 },
>> + .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA0] = { .reg_off = 0x2ac, .bit_off = 8 },
>> + .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA1] = { .reg_off = 0x2b4, .bit_off = 8 },
>> + .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA2] = { .reg_off = 0x2c4, .bit_off = 8 },
>> + .clk_ctrls[DPU_CLK_CTRL_REG_DMA] = { .reg_off = 0x2bc, .bit_off = 20 },
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_ctl_cfg sm6350_ctl[] = {
>> + {
>> + .name = "ctl_0", .id = CTL_0,
>> + .base = 0x1000, .len = 0x1dc,
>> + .features = BIT(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG),
>> + .intr_start = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2, 9),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "ctl_1", .id = CTL_1,
>> + .base = 0x1200, .len = 0x1dc,
>> + .features = BIT(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG),
>> + .intr_start = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2, 10),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "ctl_2", .id = CTL_2,
>> + .base = 0x1400, .len = 0x1dc,
>> + .features = BIT(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG),
>> + .intr_start = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2, 11),
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "ctl_3", .id = CTL_3,
>> + .base = 0x1600, .len = 0x1dc,
>> + .features = BIT(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG),
>> + .intr_start = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2, 12),
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sm6350_sspp[] = {
>> + SSPP_BLK("sspp_0", SSPP_VIG0, 0x4000, 0x1f8, VIG_SC7180_MASK,
>> + sc7180_vig_sblk_0, 0, SSPP_TYPE_VIG, DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0),
>> + SSPP_BLK("sspp_8", SSPP_DMA0, 0x24000, 0x1f8, DMA_SDM845_MASK,
>> + sdm845_dma_sblk_0, 1, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA0),
>> + SSPP_BLK("sspp_9", SSPP_DMA1, 0x26000, 0x1f8, DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK,
>> + sdm845_dma_sblk_1, 5, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA1),
>> + SSPP_BLK("sspp_10", SSPP_DMA2, 0x28000, 0x1f8, DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK,
>> + sdm845_dma_sblk_2, 9, SSPP_TYPE_DMA, DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA2),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_lm_cfg sm6350_lm[] = {
>> + LM_BLK("lm_0", LM_0, 0x44000, MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
>> + &sc7180_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_0, LM_1, DSPP_0),
>> + LM_BLK("lm_1", LM_1, 0x45000, MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
>> + &sc7180_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_1, LM_0, 0),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_dspp_cfg sm6350_dspp[] = {
>> + DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>> + &sm8150_dspp_sblk),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct dpu_pingpong_cfg sm6350_pp[] = {
>> + PP_BLK("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, PINGPONG_SM8150_MASK, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>> + DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8),
>> + -1),
>> + PP_BLK("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, PINGPONG_SM8150_MASK, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>> + DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 9),
>> + -1),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_intf_cfg sm6350_intf[] = {
>> + INTF_BLK("intf_0", INTF_0, 0x6a000, 0x2c0, INTF_DP, 0, 35, INTF_SC7180_MASK,
>> + DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 24),
>> + DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 25)),
>> + INTF_BLK_DSI_TE("intf_1", INTF_1, 0x6a800, 0x2c0, INTF_DSI, 0, 35, INTF_SC7180_MASK,
>> + DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 26),
>> + DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 27),
>> + DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_INTF1_TEAR_INTR, 2)),
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_vbif_cfg sm6350_vbif[] = {
>> + {
>> + .name = "vbif_0", .id = VBIF_RT,
>> + .base = 0, .len = 0x1044,
>> + .features = BIT(DPU_VBIF_QOS_REMAP),
>> + .xin_halt_timeout = 0x4000,
>> + .qos_rt_tbl = {
>> + .npriority_lvl = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_rt_pri_lvl),
>> + .priority_lvl = sdm845_rt_pri_lvl,
>> + },
>> + .qos_nrt_tbl = {
>> + .npriority_lvl = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_nrt_pri_lvl),
>> + .priority_lvl = sdm845_nrt_pri_lvl,
>> + },
>> + .memtype_count = 14,
>> + .memtype = {3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3},
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct dpu_perf_cfg sm6350_perf_data = {
>> + .max_bw_low = 4200000,
>> + .max_bw_high = 5100000,
>> + .min_core_ib = 2500000,
>> + .min_llcc_ib = 0,
>> + .min_dram_ib = 1600000,
>> + .min_prefill_lines = 35,
>> + /* TODO: confirm danger_lut_tbl */
>> + .danger_lut_tbl = {0xffff, 0xffff, 0x0, 0x0, 0xffff},
safe_lut_tbl is missing.
>> + .qos_lut_tbl = {
>> + {.nentry = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_qos_linear_macrotile),
>> + .entries = sm6350_qos_linear_macrotile
>> + },
>> + {.nentry = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_qos_linear_macrotile),
>> + .entries = sm6350_qos_linear_macrotile
>> + },
>> + {.nentry = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7180_qos_nrt),
>> + .entries = sc7180_qos_nrt
>> + },
>
> Strangely there are only 3 entries here, for LINEAR, MACROTILE and NRT.
> Where's CWB and MACROTILE_QSEED? Or was dpu_qos_lut_usage only extended
> to account for more entries in danger_lut_tbl? How about safe_lut_tbl?
This is a pending item on my plate, to sort out the LUT programming step
by step. Items currently missing:
- portrait vs landscape programming for danger and safe lut
- missing qos_lut entries: inline rotation, inline_restricted fmt (for
sc8280xp+), some special WB modes
- clean separation of qseed qos_lut_tbl. If you check the latest
display-drivers, it has matrix to select normal vs qseed for each of the
possible usecases.
>
>> + },
>> + .cdp_cfg = {
>> + {.rd_enable = 1, .wr_enable = 1},
>> + {.rd_enable = 1, .wr_enable = 0}
>> + },
>> + .clk_inefficiency_factor = 105,
>> + .bw_inefficiency_factor = 120,
>> +};
>> +
>> +const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sm6350_cfg = {
>> + .caps = &sm6350_dpu_caps,
>> + .ubwc = &sm6350_ubwc_cfg,
>> + .mdp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_mdp),
>> + .mdp = sm6350_mdp,
>> + .ctl_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_ctl),
>> + .ctl = sm6350_ctl,
>> + .sspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_sspp),
>> + .sspp = sm6350_sspp,
>> + .mixer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_lm),
>> + .mixer = sm6350_lm,
>> + .dspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_dspp),
>> + .dspp = sm6350_dspp,
>> + .pingpong_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_pp),
>> + .pingpong = sm6350_pp,
>> + .intf_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_intf),
>> + .intf = sm6350_intf,
>> + .vbif_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6350_vbif),
>> + .vbif = sm6350_vbif,
>> + .reg_dma_count = 1,
>> + .dma_cfg = &sm8250_regdma,
>> + .perf = &sm6350_perf_data,
>> + .mdss_irqs = BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR) | \
>> + BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2) | \
>> + BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_HIST_INTR) | \
>> + BIT(MDP_INTF0_INTR) | \
>> + BIT(MDP_INTF1_INTR) | \
>> + BIT(MDP_INTF1_TEAR_INTR),
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> index 9daeaccc4f52..5ef1dffc27dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> @@ -748,6 +748,10 @@ static const struct dpu_qos_lut_entry sc7180_qos_linear[] = {
>> {.fl = 0, .lut = 0x0011222222335777},
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct dpu_qos_lut_entry sm6350_qos_linear_macrotile[] = {
>> + {.fl = 0, .lut = 0x0011223445566777 },
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct dpu_qos_lut_entry sm8150_qos_linear[] = {
>> {.fl = 0, .lut = 0x0011222222223357 },
>> };
>> @@ -803,6 +807,7 @@ static const struct dpu_qos_lut_entry sc7180_qos_nrt[] = {
>> #include "catalog/dpu_6_0_sm8250.h"
>> #include "catalog/dpu_6_2_sc7180.h"
>> #include "catalog/dpu_6_3_sm6115.h"
>> +#include "catalog/dpu_6_4_sm6350.h"
>> #include "catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h"
>>
>> #include "catalog/dpu_7_0_sm8350.h"
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> index e9237321df77..56af77353b1e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> @@ -320,6 +320,8 @@ enum dpu_qos_lut_usage {
>> DPU_QOS_LUT_USAGE_LINEAR,
>> DPU_QOS_LUT_USAGE_MACROTILE,
>> DPU_QOS_LUT_USAGE_NRT,
>> + DPU_QOS_LUT_USAGE_CWB,
>> + DPU_QOS_LUT_USAGE_MACROTILE_QSEED,
>
> Because you allocated extra space for them here. Either drop this, or
> do it in a separate patch and provide the QOS and safe LUTs in the
> catalog?
I asked them to be removed during v2 review, but I missed Konrad's
response at that time.
>
> - Marijn
>
>> DPU_QOS_LUT_USAGE_MAX,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -880,6 +882,7 @@ extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sc8180x_cfg;
>> extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sm8250_cfg;
>> extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sc7180_cfg;
>> extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sm6115_cfg;
>> +extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sm6350_cfg;
>> extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_qcm2290_cfg;
>> extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sm8350_cfg;
>> extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sc7280_cfg;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> index 0e7a68714e9e..46be7ad8d615 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> @@ -1286,6 +1286,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dpu_dt_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-dpu", .data = &dpu_sc8180x_cfg, },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dpu", .data = &dpu_sc8280xp_cfg, },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm6115-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm6115_cfg, },
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm6350_cfg, },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8150_cfg, },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8250_cfg, },
>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8350_cfg, },
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list