[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pmu: Make PMU sample array two-dimensional
Dixit, Ashutosh
ashutosh.dixit at intel.com
Wed May 24 17:38:04 UTC 2023
On Wed, 24 May 2023 04:38:18 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
Hi Tvrtko,
> On 23/05/2023 16:19, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> > No functional changes but we can remove some unsightly index computation
> > and read/write functions if we convert the PMU sample array from a
> > one-dimensional to a two-dimensional array.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 60 ++++++++++-----------------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > index b47d890d4ada1..137e0df9573ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > @@ -195,33 +195,6 @@ static inline s64 ktime_since_raw(const ktime_t kt)
> > return ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get_raw(), kt));
> > }
> > -static unsigned int
> > -__sample_idx(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id, int sample)
> > -{
> > - unsigned int idx = gt_id * __I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS + sample;
> > -
> > - GEM_BUG_ON(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pmu->sample));
> > -
> > - return idx;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static u64 read_sample(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id, int sample)
> > -{
> > - return pmu->sample[__sample_idx(pmu, gt_id, sample)].cur;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void
> > -store_sample(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id, int sample, u64 val)
> > -{
> > - pmu->sample[__sample_idx(pmu, gt_id, sample)].cur = val;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void
> > -add_sample_mult(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id, int sample, u32 val, u32 mul)
> > -{
> > - pmu->sample[__sample_idx(pmu, gt_id, sample)].cur += mul_u32_u32(val, mul);
> > -}
>
> IMO read and store helpers could have stayed and just changed the
> implementation. Like add_sample_mult which you just moved. I would have
> been a smaller patch. So dunno.. a bit of a reluctant r-b.
Are you referring just to add_sample_mult or to all the other functions
too? add_sample_mult I moved it to where it was before bc4be0a38b63
("drm/i915/pmu: Prepare for multi-tile non-engine counters"), could have
left it here I guess.
The other read and store helpers are not needed with the 2-d array at all
since the compiler itself will do that, so I thought it was better to get
rid of them completely.
Let me know if you want any changes, otherwise I will leave as is.
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Thanks for the review. Thanks Andrzej too :)
--
Ashutosh
> > -
> > static u64 get_rc6(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> > @@ -240,7 +213,7 @@ static u64 get_rc6(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > if (awake) {
> > - store_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6, val);
> > + pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur = val;
> > } else {
> > /*
> > * We think we are runtime suspended.
> > @@ -250,13 +223,13 @@ static u64 get_rc6(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > * counter value.
> > */
> > val = ktime_since_raw(pmu->sleep_last[gt_id]);
> > - val += read_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6);
> > + val += pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur;
> > }
> > - if (val < read_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED))
> > - val = read_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED);
> > + if (val < pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED].cur)
> > + val = pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED].cur;
> > else
> > - store_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED, val);
> > + pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED].cur = val;
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > @@ -275,9 +248,8 @@ static void init_rc6(struct i915_pmu *pmu)
> > with_intel_runtime_pm(gt->uncore->rpm, wakeref) {
> > u64 val = __get_rc6(gt);
> > - store_sample(pmu, i, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6, val);
> > - store_sample(pmu, i, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED,
> > - val);
> > + pmu->sample[i][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur = val;
> > + pmu->sample[i][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED].cur = val;
> > pmu->sleep_last[i] = ktime_get_raw();
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -287,7 +259,7 @@ static void park_rc6(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > {
> > struct i915_pmu *pmu = >->i915->pmu;
> > - store_sample(pmu, gt->info.id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6, __get_rc6(gt));
> > + pmu->sample[gt->info.id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur = __get_rc6(gt);
> > pmu->sleep_last[gt->info.id] = ktime_get_raw();
> > }
> > @@ -428,6 +400,12 @@ engines_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int
> > period_ns)
> > }
> > }
> > +static void
> > +add_sample_mult(struct i915_pmu_sample *sample, u32 val, u32 mul)
> > +{
> > + sample->cur += mul_u32_u32(val, mul);
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool
> > frequency_sampling_enabled(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt)
> > {
> > @@ -467,12 +445,12 @@ frequency_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int period_ns)
> > if (!val)
> > val = intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->cur_freq);
> > - add_sample_mult(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_ACT,
> > + add_sample_mult(&pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_ACT],
> > val, period_ns / 1000);
> > }
> > if (pmu->enable &
> > config_mask(__I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY(gt_id))) {
> > - add_sample_mult(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ,
> > + add_sample_mult(&pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ],
> > intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps),
> > period_ns / 1000);
> > }
> > @@ -673,14 +651,12 @@ static u64 __i915_pmu_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
> > switch (config) {
> > case I915_PMU_ACTUAL_FREQUENCY:
> > val =
> > - div_u64(read_sample(pmu, gt_id,
> > - __I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_ACT),
> > + div_u64(pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_ACT].cur,
> > USEC_PER_SEC /* to MHz */);
> > break;
> > case I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY:
> > val =
> > - div_u64(read_sample(pmu, gt_id,
> > - __I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ),
> > + div_u64(pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ].cur,
> > USEC_PER_SEC /* to MHz */);
> > break;
> > case I915_PMU_INTERRUPTS:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > index 33d80fbaab8bc..d20592e7db999 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct i915_pmu {
> > * Only global counters are held here, while the per-engine ones are in
> > * struct intel_engine_cs.
> > */
> > - struct i915_pmu_sample sample[I915_PMU_MAX_GTS * __I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS];
> > + struct i915_pmu_sample sample[I915_PMU_MAX_GTS][__I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS];
> > /**
> > * @sleep_last: Last time GT parked for RC6 estimation.
> > */
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list