[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Check lane count when determining FEC support

Luca Coelho luca at coelho.fi
Thu May 25 08:09:30 UTC 2023


On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 17:39 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> 
> ICL doesn't support FEC with a x1 DP link. Make sure
> we don't try to enable FEC in such cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index b27b4fb71ed7..9ac199444155 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,8 @@ static bool intel_dp_source_supports_fec(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
>  		return true;
>  
> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11 && encoder->port != PORT_A)
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11 &&
> +	    encoder->port != PORT_A && pipe_config->lane_count != 1)
>  		return true;
>  
>  	return false;
> @@ -1234,7 +1235,7 @@ static bool intel_dp_supports_fec(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  static bool intel_dp_supports_dsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  				  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> -	if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DP) && !crtc_state->fec_enable)
> +	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && !crtc_state->fec_enable)

I'm probably missing something, but this change...


>  		return false;
>  
>  	return intel_dsc_source_support(crtc_state) &&
> @@ -1580,15 +1581,6 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	int pipe_bpp;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	pipe_config->fec_enable = !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> -		intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> -
> -	if (!intel_dp_supports_dsc(intel_dp, pipe_config))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	if (!intel_dp_dsc_supports_format(intel_dp, pipe_config->output_format))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	if (compute_pipe_bpp)
>  		pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
>  	else
> @@ -1615,6 +1607,15 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	pipe_config->port_clock = limits->max_rate;
>  	pipe_config->lane_count = limits->max_lane_count;
>  
> +	pipe_config->fec_enable = !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> +		intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> +
> +	if (!intel_dp_supports_dsc(intel_dp, pipe_config))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!intel_dp_dsc_supports_format(intel_dp, pipe_config->output_format))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
>  		pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp =
>  			min_t(u16, drm_edp_dsc_sink_output_bpp(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd) >> 4,

...and this code move are not explained in the commit message? How are
they related?

--
Cheers,
Luca.


More information about the dri-devel mailing list