[PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: Fix CHV CGM CSC coefficient sign handling
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri May 26 13:48:15 UTC 2023
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:55:08PM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville Syrjala
> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:19 PM
> > To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: Fix CHV CGM CSC coefficient sign handling
> >
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > The CHV CGM CSC coefficients are in s4.12 two's complement format. Fix the CTM-
> > >CGM conversion to handle that correctly instead of pretending that the hw
> > coefficients are also in some sign-magnitude format.
>
> Spec is slightly confusing when it says:
> "CGM CSC : Input pixels to the CGM CSC are 14 bits. (u.14 format). Coefficients are 16 bits (s3.12)."
> Also here:
> "Programmable parameters :
> c0[15 :0], c1[15 :0], c2[15 :0], c3[15 :0], c4[15 :0], c5[15 :0], c6[15 :0], c7[15 :0], c8[15 :0] ; // signed matrix coefficients (s3.12)"
Yeah, the spec just uses a weird notation where it doesn't count the msb
in the bits.
>
> But the coefficients are 16bits, can you help understand how were you able to crack this 😊
The 16bit coefficient already made me suspect they screwed up
the notation. Testing specific values on real hardware
confirmed that.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 46 ++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> > index 4fc16cac052d..63141f4ed372 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> > @@ -568,29 +568,41 @@ static void icl_load_csc_matrix(const struct
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > icl_update_output_csc(crtc, &crtc_state->output_csc); }
> >
> > +static u16 ctm_to_twos_complement(u64 coeff, int int_bits, int
> > +frac_bits) {
> > + s64 c = CTM_COEFF_ABS(coeff);
> > +
> > + /* leave an extra bit for rounding */
> > + c >>= 32 - frac_bits - 1;
> > +
> > + /* round and drop the extra bit */
> > + c = (c + 1) >> 1;
> > +
> > + if (CTM_COEFF_NEGATIVE(coeff))
> > + c = -c;
> > +
> > + c = clamp(c, -(s64)BIT(int_bits + frac_bits - 1),
> > + (s64)(BIT(int_bits + frac_bits - 1) - 1));
> > +
> > + return c & (BIT(int_bits + frac_bits) - 1); }
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * CHV Color Gamut Mapping (CGM) CSC
> > + * |r| | c0 c1 c2 | |r|
> > + * |g| = | c3 c4 c5 | x |g|
> > + * |b| | c6 c7 c8 | |b|
> > + *
> > + * Coefficients are two's complement s4.12.
> > + */
> > static void chv_cgm_csc_convert_ctm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > struct intel_csc_matrix *csc)
> > {
> > const struct drm_color_ctm *ctm = crtc_state->hw.ctm->data;
> > int i;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
> > - u64 abs_coeff = ((1ULL << 63) - 1) & ctm->matrix[i];
> > -
> > - /* Round coefficient. */
> > - abs_coeff += 1 << (32 - 13);
> > - /* Clamp to hardware limits. */
> > - abs_coeff = clamp_val(abs_coeff, 0, CTM_COEFF_8_0 - 1);
> > -
> > - csc->coeff[i] = 0;
> > -
> > - /* Write coefficients in S3.12 format. */
> > - if (ctm->matrix[i] & (1ULL << 63))
> > - csc->coeff[i] |= 1 << 15;
> > -
> > - csc->coeff[i] |= ((abs_coeff >> 32) & 7) << 12;
> > - csc->coeff[i] |= (abs_coeff >> 20) & 0xfff;
> > - }
> > + for (i = 0; i < 9; i++)
> > + csc->coeff[i] = ctm_to_twos_complement(ctm->matrix[i], 4, 12);
> > }
> >
> > static void chv_load_cgm_csc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > --
> > 2.39.2
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list