[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Associate PWM device to auxiliary device
Doug Anderson
dianders at chromium.org
Tue Nov 28 00:46:55 UTC 2023
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 2:15 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> It's the ti_sn65dsi86.pwm auxiliary driver that creates the pwmchip, so
> let the auxiliary device be the parent of the pwm device.
>
> Note that getting a reference to the ti-sn65dsi86's pwm using pwm_get()
> isn't affected by this change as ti_sn65dsi86_add_aux_device() sets the
> auxiliary device's of_node to that of the main device.
>
> Also change PM runtime tracking and diagnostic messages to use that one.
> As the PM runtime functions also handle parent devices this should work
> fine, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> this patch has an (easy to resolve) conflict with a patch I sent earlier
> "drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Simplify using pm_runtime_resume_and_get()"
> (https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20231123175425.496956-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de).
> I was unsure if I should base this new patch on that older one.
>
> While I think the patch is fine, I'd have a better feeling about it if
> someone could give feedback that the PWM still works as intended with
> this change.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
This looks right to me.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
For now, I'll wait for Bjorn (or someone else who uses this PWM) to
give a Tested-by before applying.
-Doug
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list