[PATCH v2 2/2] drm/todo: Add entry to clean up former seltests suites

[Maira Canal]

Hi Maxime,

Wouldn't be nice to add to the TODO list an item regarding the deleted
drm_mm tests? Something just to remember us to develop new tests for it
in the future.

Best Regards,
- Maíra

On 10/25/23 10:24, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Most of those suites are undocumented and aren't really clear about what
> they are testing. Let's add a TODO entry as a future task to get started
> into KUnit and DRM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>
> ---
>   Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> index 03fe5d1247be..b62c7fa0c2bc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
> @@ -621,6 +621,23 @@ Contact: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm at redhat.com>
>   
>   Level: Intermediate
>   
> +Clean up and document former selftests suites
> +---------------------------------------------
> +
> +Some KUnit test suites (drm_buddy, drm_cmdline_parser, drm_damage_helper,
> +drm_format, drm_framebuffer, drm_dp_mst_helper, drm_mm, drm_plane_helper and
> +drm_rect) are former selftests suites that have been converted over when KUnit
> +was first introduced.
> +
> +These suites were fairly undocumented, and with different goals than what unit
> +tests can be. Trying to identify what each test in these suites actually test
> +for, whether that makes sense for a unit test, and either remove it if it
> +doesn't or document it if it does would be of great help.
> +
> +Contact: Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>
> +
> +Level: Intermediate
> +
>   Enable trinity for DRM
>   ----------------------
>