[PATCH v2 02/15] drm/panthor: Add uAPI
Steven Price
steven.price at arm.com
Mon Sep 4 15:22:19 UTC 2023
On 04/09/2023 10:26, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 08:42:08 +0100
> Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/09/2023 17:10, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:53:15 +0200
>>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at collabora.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * DOC: MMIO regions exposed to userspace.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * .. c:macro:: DRM_PANTHOR_USER_MMIO_OFFSET
>>>> + *
>>>> + * File offset for all MMIO regions being exposed to userspace. Don't use
>>>> + * this value directly, use DRM_PANTHOR_USER_<name>_OFFSET values instead.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * .. c:macro:: DRM_PANTHOR_USER_FLUSH_ID_MMIO_OFFSET
>>>> + *
>>>> + * File offset for the LATEST_FLUSH_ID register. The Userspace driver controls
>>>> + * GPU cache flushling through CS instructions, but the flush reduction
>>>> + * mechanism requires a flush_id. This flush_id could be queried with an
>>>> + * ioctl, but Arm provides a well-isolated register page containing only this
>>>> + * read-only register, so let's expose this page through a static mmap offset
>>>> + * and allow direct mapping of this MMIO region so we can avoid the
>>>> + * user <-> kernel round-trip.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define DRM_PANTHOR_USER_MMIO_OFFSET (0x1ull << 56)
>>>
>>> I'm playing with a 32-bit kernel/userspace, and this is problematic,
>>> because vm_pgoff is limited to 32-bit there, meaning we can only map up
>>> to (1ull << (PAGE_SHIFT + 32)) - 1. Should we add a DEV_QUERY to let
>>> userspace set the mmio range?
>>
>> Hmm, I was rather hoping we could ignore 32 bit these days ;) But while
>> I can't see why anyone would be running a 32 bit kernel, I guess 32 bit
>> user space is likely to still be needed.
>
> Uh, I just hit a new problem with 32-bit kernels: the io-pgtable
> interface (io_pgtable_ops) passes device VAs as unsigned longs, meaning
> the GPU VA space is limited to 4G on a 32-bit build :-(. Robin, any
> chance you could advise me on what to do here?
>
> 1. assume this limitation is here for a good reason, and limit the GPU
> VA space to 32-bits on 32-bit kernels
>
> or
>
> 2. update the interface to make iova an u64
I'm not sure I can answer the question from a technical perspective,
hopefully Robin will be able to.
But why do we care about 32-bit kernels on a platform which is new
enough to have a CSF-GPU (and by extension a recent 64-bit CPU)?
Given the other limitations present in a 32-bit kernel I'd be tempted to
say '1' just for simplicity. Especially since apparently we've lived
with this for panfrost which presumably has the same limitation (even
though all Bifrost/Midgard GPUs have at least 33 bits of VA space).
Steve
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list