MAINTAINERS: Update drm-misc entry to match all drivers

[suijingfeng]

Hi,


On 2023/9/19 21:12, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> We've had a number of times when a patch slipped through and we couldn't
> pick them up either because our MAINTAINERS entry only covers the
> framework and thus we weren't Cc'd.
>
> Let's take another approach where we match everything, and remove all
> the drivers that are not maintained through drm-misc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
>   MAINTAINERS | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 90f13281d297..757d4f33e158 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -6860,12 +6860,29 @@ M:	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
>   S:	Maintained
>   W:	https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/maintainer-tools/drm-misc.html
>   T:	git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc
> +F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/
> +F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/
>   F:	Documentation/gpu/
> -F:	drivers/gpu/drm/*
> +F:	drivers/gpu/drm/
>   F:	drivers/gpu/vga/
> -F:	include/drm/drm*
> +F:	include/drm/drm
>   F:	include/linux/vga*
> -F:	include/uapi/drm/drm*
> +F:	include/uapi/drm/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/amd/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/armada/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/imx/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/msm/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/
> +X:	drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/
>   
>   DRM DRIVERS FOR ALLWINNER A10
>   M:	Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>


Nice patch!

Well, I'm just curious about why the drm/ingenic and drm/gma500 are not maintained through drm-misc?

As far as I know:
1) the drm/ingenic driver don't have a "T" annotation (location of the link).
2) the "T" of drm/gma500 is "git git://github.com/patjak/drm-gma500", but the code for this link is not up to date.

I think at least the drm/ingenic and drm/gma500 drivers are *actually* maintained through drm-misc,
So perhaps, these two drivers should not be excluded. Am I correct?