[PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/bios: switch to struct drm_edid and struct drm_edid_product_id
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Apr 9 15:40:47 UTC 2024
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 12:46:11PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> To avoid accessing and parsing the raw EDID with drm_edid_raw(), switch
> to the struct drm_edid based function to extract product id, and use the
> drm printer function to debug log it.
>
> The underlying assumption is that struct drm_edid_product_id and struct
> lvds_pnp_id describe identical data, albeit with slightly different
> member definitions.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Melissa Wen <mwen at igalia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 43 ++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 2abd2d7ceda2..3d89e4b39fed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -600,6 +600,9 @@ get_lvds_pnp_id(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data,
> const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs,
> int index)
> {
> + /* These two are supposed to have the same layout in memory. */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct lvds_pnp_id) != sizeof(struct drm_edid_product_id));
> +
> return (const void *)data + ptrs->ptr[index].panel_pnp_id.offset;
> }
>
> @@ -613,19 +616,6 @@ get_lfp_data_tail(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static void dump_pnp_id(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> - const struct lvds_pnp_id *pnp_id,
> - const char *name)
> -{
> - u16 mfg_name = be16_to_cpu((__force __be16)pnp_id->mfg_name);
> - char vend[4];
> -
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "%s PNPID mfg: %s (0x%x), prod: %u, serial: %u, week: %d, year: %d\n",
> - name, drm_edid_decode_mfg_id(mfg_name, vend),
> - pnp_id->mfg_name, pnp_id->product_code, pnp_id->serial,
> - pnp_id->mfg_week, pnp_id->mfg_year + 1990);
> -}
> -
> static int opregion_get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata,
> const struct drm_edid *drm_edid, bool use_fallback)
> @@ -664,21 +654,21 @@ static int pnpid_get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> {
> const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *data;
> const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs;
> - const struct lvds_pnp_id *edid_id;
> - struct lvds_pnp_id edid_id_nodate;
> - const struct edid *edid = drm_edid_raw(drm_edid); /* FIXME */
> + struct drm_edid_product_id product_id, product_id_nodate;
> + struct drm_printer p;
> int i, best = -1;
>
> - if (!edid)
> + if (!drm_edid)
> return -1;
>
> - edid_id = (const void *)&edid->mfg_id[0];
> + drm_edid_get_product_id(drm_edid, &product_id);
I don't really like s/edid_id/product_id/ rename.
The variable names were trying to convey the source of
the data (EDID vs. VBT).
But not a huge deal wither way. Series is
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> - edid_id_nodate = *edid_id;
> - edid_id_nodate.mfg_week = 0;
> - edid_id_nodate.mfg_year = 0;
> + product_id_nodate = product_id;
> + product_id_nodate.week_of_manufacture = 0;
> + product_id_nodate.year_of_manufacture = 0;
>
> - dump_pnp_id(i915, edid_id, "EDID");
> + p = drm_dbg_printer(&i915->drm, DRM_UT_KMS, "EDID");
> + drm_edid_print_product_id(&p, &product_id, true);
>
> ptrs = bdb_find_section(i915, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA_PTRS);
> if (!ptrs)
> @@ -693,7 +683,7 @@ static int pnpid_get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> get_lvds_pnp_id(data, ptrs, i);
>
> /* full match? */
> - if (!memcmp(vbt_id, edid_id, sizeof(*vbt_id)))
> + if (!memcmp(vbt_id, &product_id, sizeof(*vbt_id)))
> return i;
>
> /*
> @@ -701,7 +691,7 @@ static int pnpid_get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> * and the VBT entry does not specify a date.
> */
> if (best < 0 &&
> - !memcmp(vbt_id, &edid_id_nodate, sizeof(*vbt_id)))
> + !memcmp(vbt_id, &product_id_nodate, sizeof(*vbt_id)))
> best = i;
> }
>
> @@ -888,6 +878,7 @@ parse_lfp_data(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_tail *tail;
> const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs;
> const struct lvds_pnp_id *pnp_id;
> + struct drm_printer p;
> int panel_type = panel->vbt.panel_type;
>
> ptrs = bdb_find_section(i915, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA_PTRS);
> @@ -902,7 +893,9 @@ parse_lfp_data(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> parse_lfp_panel_dtd(i915, panel, data, ptrs);
>
> pnp_id = get_lvds_pnp_id(data, ptrs, panel_type);
> - dump_pnp_id(i915, pnp_id, "Panel");
> +
> + p = drm_dbg_printer(&i915->drm, DRM_UT_KMS, "Panel");
> + drm_edid_print_product_id(&p, (const struct drm_edid_product_id *)pnp_id, false);
>
> tail = get_lfp_data_tail(data, ptrs);
> if (!tail)
> --
> 2.39.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list