[PATCH 03/12] drm/msm/dpu: use format-related definitions from mdp_common.xml.h

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 01:18:42PM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/10/2024 1:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 23:00, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 12/2/2023 1:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > Instead of having DPU-specific defines, switch to the definitions from
> > > > the mdp_common.xml.h file. This is the preparation for merged of DPU and
> > > > MDP format tables.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Adding MDP_***__ usages in DPU driver is quite confusing.
> > > 
> > > Can we align to a common naming scheme such as DISP_***?
> > 
> > No, it's not something display-generic. It is specific to MDP
> > platforms. In the end DPU is a continuation of the MDP lineup, isn't
> > it?
> > 
> 
> No some aspects of the hw are completely different as you already know
> between MDP4/MDP5 and DPU. Bringing back MDP usages into DPU does not seem
> right.

MDP4 is different, it's true. But there is a lot of common between MDP5
and DPU. Frakly speaking, I don't see an issue with using the constant
that was defined for MDP5 for DPU layer. Especially since we are also
going to use mdp_ functions for format handling.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry