[v1,1/3] drm/panel: ili9341: Correct use of device property APIs

[Maxime Ripard]

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 01:57:46PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On 2024/4/26 14:23, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:43:18AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > > On 2024/4/26 03:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:08:16AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > > > > On 2024/4/25 22:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > It seems driver missed the point of proper use of device property APIs.
> > > > > > Correct this by updating headers and calls respectively.
> > > > > You are using the 'seems' here exactly saying that you are not 100% sure.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please allow me to tell you the truth: This patch again has ZERO effect.
> > > > > It fix nothing. And this patch is has the risks to be wrong.
> > > > Huh?! Really, stop commenting the stuff you do not understand.
> > > I'm actually a professional display drivers developer at the downstream
> > > in the past, despite my contribution to upstream is less. But I believe
> > > that all panel driver developers know what I'm talking about. So please
> > > have take a look at my replies.
> > Most of the interactions you had in this series has been uncalled for.
> > You might be against a patch, but there's no need to go to such length.
> > 
> > As far as I'm concerned, this patch is fine to me in itself, and I don't
> > see anything that would prevent us from merging it.
> 
> No one is preventing you, as long as don't misunderstanding what other
> people's technical replies intentionally. I'm just a usual and normal
> contributor, I hope the world will better than yesterday.

You should seriously consider your tone when replying then.

> Saying such thing to me may not proper, I guess you may want to talk
> to peoples who has the push rights

I think you misunderstood me. My point was that your several rants were
uncalled for and aren't the kind of things we're doing here.

I know very well how to get a patch merged, thanks.

> just make sure it isn't a insult to the professionalism of drm bridge
> community itself though.

I'm not sure why you're bringing the bridge community or its
professionalism. It's a panel, not a bridge, and I never doubted the
professionalism of anyone.

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 273 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20240429/efe0f3b9/attachment.sig>