[PATCH] nouveau: Add missing break statement

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Tue Apr 30 13:53:09 UTC 2024


On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 06:48:40PM GMT, Chaitanya Kumar Borah wrote:
>Add the missing break statement that causes the following build error
>
>	  CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.o
>	../drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c: In function ‘build_registry’:
>	../drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c:1266:3: error: label at end of compound statement
>	1266 |   default:
>	      |   ^~~~~~~
>	  CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.o
>	  HDRTEST drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h
>	  CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/imu_v11_0.o
>	make[7]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:244: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.o] Error 1
>	make[7]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
>Fixes: b58a0bc904ff ("nouveau: add command-line GSP-RM registry support")
>Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/913052ca6c0988db1bab293cfae38529251b4594.camel@nvidia.com/T/#m3c9acebac754f2e74a85b76c858c093bb1aacaf0

Just found a previous bug report, so we can add here:

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYu7Ug0K8h9QJT0WbtWh_LL9Juc+VC0WMU_Z_vSSPDNymg@mail.gmail.com/


>Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah at intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c
>index 0b46db5c77b8..63619512e7f6 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c
>@@ -1264,6 +1264,7 @@ static void build_registry(struct nvkm_gsp *gsp, PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE *registry
> 			str_offset += reg->vlen;
> 			break;
> 		default:
>+			break;


since reg->type is an enum and we are handling all the values, another
possible approach is to remove the default handling and then the
compiler will warn you of missing cases if built with -Wswitch.

Any of the approaches seem good to me.

Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>

Lucas De Marchi

> 		}
>
> 		i++;
>-- 
>2.25.1
>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list