[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: use dev_err_probe when failing to get panel bridge
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at linux.intel.com
Thu Aug 8 10:35:23 UTC 2024
Hi Luca,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:26:14PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> When devm_drm_of_get_bridge() fails, the probe fails silently. Use
> dev_err_probe() instead to log an error or report the deferral reason,
> whichever is applicable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli at bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> index 57a7ed13f996..60b9f14d769a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int sn65dsi83_parse_dt(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, enum sn65dsi83_model model)
>
> panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 2, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(panel_bridge))
> - return PTR_ERR(panel_bridge);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(panel_bridge), "Failed to get panel bridge\n");
patch looks good, but the message is a bit misleading. You are
not failing to get the panel bridge, but you are failing to find
a panel bridge in a DT node. Right?
Andi
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list