[PATCH v2 3/4] fix vmap_udmabuf error page set
Huan Yang
link at vivo.com
Mon Aug 12 02:49:44 UTC 2024
在 2024/8/10 10:39, Kasireddy, Vivek 写道:
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from vivek.kasireddy at intel.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> Hi Huan,
>
>> Currently vmap_udmabuf set page's array by each folio.
>> But, ubuf->folios is only contain's the folio's head page.
>>
>> That mean we repeatedly mapped the folio head page to the vmalloc area.
>>
>> This patch fix it, set each folio's page correct, so that pages array
>> contains right page, and then map into vmalloc area
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huan Yang <link at vivo.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
>> index af2391cea0bf..9737f063b6b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c
>> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static int vmap_udmabuf(struct dma_buf *buf, struct
>> iosys_map *map)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> for (pg = 0; pg < ubuf->pagecount; pg++)
>> - pages[pg] = &ubuf->folios[pg]->page;
>> + pages[pg] = folio_page(ubuf->folios[pg],
>> + ubuf->offsets[pg] >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> I believe the correct way to address this issue is to introduce a folio variant
> of vm_map_ram() and use that instead, along with the offsets info.
>
> However, for the time being, I think we can reject vmap of hugetlb folios
> by checking for non-zero offset values.
Do you mean, we do not want to vmap hugetlb folios? So by check this is
reasonable.
BTW, I found that recently shmem has started to support mTHP. (Even if
need enable a switch)
If this, not only hugetlb contains large folio, so ignore offset may not
too good?(I am not entirely sure whether mTHP can be used with shmem for
memfd.)
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Vivek
>
>> vaddr = vm_map_ram(pages, ubuf->pagecount, -1);
>> kvfree(pages);
>> --
>> 2.45.2
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list