[PATCH v8 3/6] drm/ttm: Use fault-injection to test error paths
kernel test robot
lkp at intel.com
Fri Aug 16 17:35:06 UTC 2024
Hi Thomas,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20240816]
[also build test ERROR on v6.11-rc3]
[cannot apply to drm-xe/drm-xe-next linus/master v6.11-rc3 v6.11-rc2 v6.11-rc1]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Thomas-Hellstr-m/drm-ttm-Add-a-virtual-base-class-for-graphics-memory-backup/20240816-213947
base: next-20240816
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240816133717.3102-4-thomas.hellstrom%40linux.intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v8 3/6] drm/ttm: Use fault-injection to test error paths
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240817/202408170144.N7YoWTCX-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240817/202408170144.N7YoWTCX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408170144.N7YoWTCX-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:456:8: error: call to undeclared function 'should_fail'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
456 | should_fail(&backup_fault_inject, 1)) {
| ^
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:456:21: error: use of undeclared identifier 'backup_fault_inject'
456 | should_fail(&backup_fault_inject, 1)) {
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:908:44: error: call to undeclared function 'should_fail'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
908 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION) && should_fail(&backup_fault_inject, 1))
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c:908:57: error: use of undeclared identifier 'backup_fault_inject'
908 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION) && should_fail(&backup_fault_inject, 1))
| ^
4 errors generated.
vim +/should_fail +456 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
434
435 static int ttm_pool_restore_tt(struct ttm_pool_tt_restore *restore,
436 struct ttm_backup *backup,
437 struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
438 {
439 static unsigned long __maybe_unused swappedin;
440 unsigned int i, nr = 1 << restore->order;
441 int ret = 0;
442
443 if (!ttm_pool_restore_valid(restore))
444 return 0;
445
446 for (i = restore->restored_pages; i < nr; ++i) {
447 struct page *p = restore->old_pages[i];
448
449 if (ttm_backup_page_ptr_is_handle(p)) {
450 unsigned long handle = ttm_backup_page_ptr_to_handle(p);
451
452 if (handle == 0)
453 continue;
454
455 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION) && ctx->interruptible &&
> 456 should_fail(&backup_fault_inject, 1)) {
457 ret = -EINTR;
458 break;
459 }
460
461 ret = backup->ops->copy_backed_up_page
462 (backup, restore->first_page[i],
463 handle, ctx->interruptible);
464 if (ret)
465 break;
466
467 backup->ops->drop(backup, handle);
468 } else if (p) {
469 /*
470 * We could probably avoid splitting the old page
471 * using clever logic, but ATM we don't care.
472 */
473 ttm_pool_split_for_swap(restore->pool, p);
474 copy_highpage(restore->first_page[i], p);
475 __free_pages(p, 0);
476 }
477
478 restore->restored_pages++;
479 restore->old_pages[i] = NULL;
480 cond_resched();
481 }
482
483 return ret;
484 }
485
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list