[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Rename WL-355608-A8 panel

[Neil Armstrong]

On 30/06/2024 10:16, Ryan Walklin wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, at 5:59 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 04:34:11PM GMT, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:04:19PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 02:25:54PM GMT, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Can it be more specific ? because there's a lot of rg35xx defined in bindings:
>>>>>   anbernic,rg351m
>>>>>   anbernic,rg351v
>>>>>   anbernic,rg353p
>>>>>   anbernic,rg353ps
>>>>>   anbernic,rg353v
>>>>>   anbernic,rg353vs
>>>>>   anbernic,rg35xx-2024
>>>>>   anbernic,rg35xx-plus
>>>>>   anbernic,rg35xx-h
> 
> Just to note only the three rg35xx-* devices use this particular panel.
> 
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, if we have an identified model name, we should probably use that,
>>>> with a comment that we couldn't figure out what the vendor was and thus
>>>> went for anbernic.
>>>
>>> What's wrong with using the wl name that already exists as the model?
>>> Using rg<whatever>-panel is total invention on our part, especially
>>> seeing as the commit message says that multiple models can use it.
>>
>> Yeah, that makes sense, sorry for the noise
>>
> Thanks both for the further feedback, agreed logical to use the device vendor and panel serial number, ie "anbernic,wl-355608-a8". Will post a V2 with a comment to that effect.

Well in this case we can keep "wl-355608-a8", because the panel vendor _is not_ anbernic.

Neil

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ryan