[PATCH 1/2] drm/panel: visionox-vtdr6130: switch to mipi_dsi wrapped functions

[Neil Armstrong]

On 28/08/2024 18:32, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 9:03 AM Neil Armstrong
> <neil.armstrong at linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Make usage of the new _multi() mipi_dsi functions instead of the
>> deprecated macros, improving error handling and printing.
>>
>> bloat-o-meter gives a 12% gain on arm64:
>> Function                                     old     new   delta
>> visionox_vtdr6130_unprepare                  208     204      -4
>> visionox_vtdr6130_prepare                   1192     896    -296
>> Total: Before=2348, After=2048, chg -12.78%
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-visionox-vtdr6130.c | 186 +++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-visionox-vtdr6130.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-visionox-vtdr6130.c
>> index 540099253e1b..ebe92871dbb6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-visionox-vtdr6130.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-visionox-vtdr6130.c
>> @@ -40,120 +40,103 @@ static void visionox_vtdr6130_reset(struct visionox_vtdr6130 *ctx)
>>   static int visionox_vtdr6130_on(struct visionox_vtdr6130 *ctx)
>>   {
>>          struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
>> -       struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
>> -       int ret;
>> +       struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
>>
>>          dsi->mode_flags |= MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
> 
> This isn't something you introduced in your patch, but I wonder if we
> should avoid setting the "MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM" bit when the function
> returns an error?

Yeah it's unrelated to this change, but I'll investigate.

> 
> In any case:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>

Thanks,
Neil