udmabuf: check_memfd_seals() is racy
Kasireddy, Vivek
vivek.kasireddy at intel.com
Tue Dec 3 08:25:32 UTC 2024
Hi Jann, Julian,
> Subject: udmabuf: check_memfd_seals() is racy
>
> Hi!
>
> Julian Orth reported at
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219106 that
Thank you for reporting this bug.
> udmabuf_create() checks for F_SEAL_WRITE in a racy way, so a udmabuf
> can end up holding references to pages in a write-sealed memfd, which
> theoretically breaks one of the security properties of memfd sealing.
> See also the discussion starting at
> <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> mm/CAHijbEV6wtTQy01djSfWBJksq4AEoZ=KYUsaKEKNSXbTTSM-
> Ww at mail.gmail.com/>.
AFAICS, this problem does not adversely affect the main user of udmabuf driver
(Qemu) given that Qemu adds F_SEAL_SEAL while creating the memfd but
I can see how other users of udmabuf driver might be impacted by this issue.
>
> I think one possible correct pattern would be something like:
>
> mapping_map_writable() [with error bailout]
> check seals with F_GET_SEALS
> udmabuf_pin_folios()
> mapping_unmap_writable()
I believe this should probably work as mapping_map_writable() would prevent
F_SEAL_WRITE from getting added later. Do you plan to send a patch to fix
this issue in udmabuf driver?
Thanks,
Vivek
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list