[PATCH v2 11/11] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add nodes related to eDP1 for RK3588
Damon Ding
damon.ding at rock-chips.com
Thu Dec 19 01:27:18 UTC 2024
Hi Heiko,
On 2024/12/18 20:45, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Damon,
>
> Am Montag, 16. Dezember 2024, 04:12:25 CET schrieb Damon Ding:
>> The related nodes are hdptxphy1_grf, hdptxphy1 and edp1. And the
>> aliases edp0 and edp1 are added to separate two independent eDP
>> devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Damon Ding <damon.ding at rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>> .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-extra.dtsi | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-extra.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-extra.dtsi
>> index 0ce0934ec6b7..17cc0b619744 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-extra.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-extra.dtsi
>> @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
>> #include "rk3588-extra-pinctrl.dtsi"
>>
>> / {
>> + aliases {
>> + edp0 = &edp0;
>> + edp1 = &edp1;
>> + };
>> +
>
> drop aliases please
I will drop it and use the registers to separate edp0 and edp1 in the
next version.
>
>
>> @@ -67,6 +72,11 @@ u2phy1_otg: otg-port {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + hdptxphy1_grf: syscon at fd5e4000 {
>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-hdptxphy-grf", "syscon";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xfd5e4000 0x0 0x100>;
>> + };
>> +
>> i2s8_8ch: i2s at fddc8000 {
>> compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-i2s-tdm";
>> reg = <0x0 0xfddc8000 0x0 0x1000>;
>
>> @@ -395,6 +434,22 @@ sata-port at 0 {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + hdptxphy1: phy at fed70000 {
>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-hdptx-phy";
>> + reg = <0x0 0xfed70000 0x0 0x2000>;
>> + clocks = <&cru CLK_USB2PHY_HDPTXRXPHY_REF>, <&cru PCLK_HDPTX1>;
>> + clock-names = "ref", "apb";
>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>> + resets = <&cru SRST_HDPTX1>, <&cru SRST_P_HDPTX1>,
>> + <&cru SRST_HDPTX1_INIT>, <&cru SRST_HDPTX1_CMN>,
>> + <&cru SRST_HDPTX1_LANE>, <&cru SRST_HDPTX1_ROPLL>,
>> + <&cru SRST_HDPTX1_LCPLL>;
>> + reset-names = "phy", "apb", "init", "cmn", "lane", "ropll",
>> + "lcpll";
>> + rockchip,grf = <&hdptxphy1_grf>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>
> the hdptxphy nodes should be their own patch, also because most likely
> Cristian's patch for hdmi1 [0] will be slightly faster.
Indeed, it is good to add edp1 node only.
>
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241211-rk3588-hdmi1-v2-2-02cdca22ff68@collabora.com
>
>
>
>
>
Best regards,
Damon
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list